have i actually picked wlad?is the fight going to happen?could i look more of an arse than you?could you not TOP something a little closer to home?could i give a **** about your insignificance to my equilibrium?life is just one big conundrum uppercut my sad little friend..
The amusing thing about you is you aim to look intelligent with your rants but your grammar just makes you look ******ed :rofl
how many times do you need to edit a reply just post the response you halfwit,yes im a froch and hatton fan,yes i support fighters from my country!again you rainman clone your throwing up some random "WWE" question.....WHAT? aneasthetist please hes coming round!!
uppercut come on,anyone looks intelligent in comparison with the missfit that is you! my grammar is my downfall like your respiratory system is yours..no ones perfect(which im sure your used to being told)flaws are apart of nature so to be pedantic and facetious about someones grammar is a little lame dont you think??besides your going off topic,
When serious posters join forces to laugh at the moron that is the 'Boxing Guru', that's the best time of the day!! :happy
So is he a cherrypicker or not then? Make up your mind! You admit he didn't "cherrypick" Lewis - he accepted a fight with the world's best and hardest-hitting heavyweight at short notice. He came back after 4 years with no warm-up bout, going straight in against the WBC champion, no.2 in the division, a known puncher (unlike Tyson). Is this the behaviour of an ALL-TIME GREAT cherrypicker? Is Mike Tyson the P4P GREATEST CHERRYPICKER OF ALL-TIME then?? Next time, don't avoid the questions to try and hide the fact your argument is full of holes, and quite frankly wrong.
Check other threads. I have not only posted the opponent, but the entire history of the event from the time it was schedled to be the date of Lewis-Tyson II, to Tyson's subsequent drop-out after wanting a tune-up, to Kirk pulling out with injury and Vitali being added as Vitali's opponent and CEDRIC BOSWELL being dropped altogether from the card. No need for Google, it wasn't that long ago. And if you ask around, I was right here during the whole thing. The Undisputed Champion doesn't go around "offering" title fights, numbnuts. He either fights mandatories to keep the belts, or answers challenges for voluntary defenses. SHOW ME PROOF that Vitali attempted to get the fight around the time that he was wasting time with the WBOgus title. :deal
This thread needs to end....it shouldve been relegated to the 2nd page 15 mins after starting..... Wlad is NOT a cherrypicker.... Haye is a good fighter with too big of a mouth. He hasnt proven **** at HW. I give him a small chance of beating Wlad at the moment, this could change but realistically he has roughly a 10% chance right now..... Haye is the best British boxer right now but no Wlad beater. Get over it!!! Vitali not a cherrypicker at all..Are you people on drugs? He comes back after a long absence and takes on the WBC champion and ****ing steamrolls him, now he wants the last man to beat him....How the **** is that cherrypicking? If Margarito thought as Vitali does we would be talking about WW unification early next year
I never claimed he was a All-Time Great cherrypicker, ********! atsch SHOW ME where I said he was. SHOW ME or STFU. :deal
You don't actually use the word "cherrypicker" but that is a mere technicality. The implications throughout this thread and the agreement with the thread-subject is clear. Have the courage of your convictions.
Oh I see, you can't find any evidence to back up your bull****, so now you are making stuff up and claiming I don't have courage if I don't agree with your false claims? Nice try. :hi:
Hey Uppercut, Why is it when Hasim Rahman called haye out on his bull**** that Haye refused to respond to him? Rahman said something to the point of "No one is ducking you, no one is afraid of you. I'd love to fight you". Hasim Rahman. The same Rahman who got KTFO by Lewis and Oleg Maskaev. **** Haye. Vitali would knock him out with one punch.