Vitali doesn't want to fight Oleg

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Brent, Feb 25, 2009.


  1. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    90
    Jul 19, 2004
    You're kidding right?:lol:

    #1. It was YOU who brought up the theory of canceling out titles. You used Holmes beating Weaver as an excuse to why Holmes never had to unify the WBA title to be undisputed Champion.... because Weaver went on AFTER Holmes beat him to win the title for a short period of time. So I proved your double standard about Wlad by pointing out that Wlad beat Peter who turned around and won the WBC title.... so why does the WBC Title now mean anything when Wlad beat Peter? According to your standards the WBA title meant nothing because Holmes had previously beaten Weaver. Can I make that any easier to understand for you? That is YOUR theory.... yet you call me a nuthugger and compare me to Don King for it.:rofl

    #2. Wlad doesn't need to beat Vitali to be considered anything. Once again.... fighting once in 5 years and beating a fighter who Wlad has already beaten sure as hell doesn't leapfrog Vitali over Wlad. That makes absolutely no sense at all. You have it backwards and I don't know why it's hard for you to understand. The only way for Vitali to be considered #1 is if HE were to fight and beat Wlad. You don't come back from 5 years of inactivity, win one fight against someone that the Champ has already beaten and be declared the True champ of the division. That is just silly. Especially when you know that they are brothers and would never fight. It's obvious to me that you simply don't like Wlad and are using this as a way of justifying not calling him the real Champ.

    Now... you praise Ring Magazine and you are going against it yourself. Ring Magazine has Wlad ranked over Vitali and according to Ring Magazine... Wlad does NOT have to fight Vitali to become Ring Champ. Wlad being the #1 could also fight the #3 Ring magazine fighter and become Ring Champ. However... Ring Magazine already showed exactly how credible they are by screwing that up in the first place. I would love to know their reasoning behind not ranking Wlad in the top 3 after beating Peter, then moving Wlad to #1 after he knocks out the Ring Mag #1 Chris Byrd.... then a short time later they have Peter at #2. Ring Magazine is just as fallable as every other title out there. Yeah, they don't block fights... but they don't create fights either, IT'S JUST A MAGAZINE!:patsch Then you go on to say that you like the IBO belt, well Wlad owns that one too. The only REAL title out there is who the fans consider the Champion. I can guarantee you that more people would consider Wlad the Champion of the division when having to choose between the others. Wlad is the true Champ.

    Now... get your head out of your ass and explain to me exactly who Vitali has beat... and exactly what he had done in the last 5 years to be considered the REAL Champion over Wlad.
     
  2. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    Poor Oleg. I'll fight him for a grand.
     
  3. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    :good

    Vitali retired without making any mandatory fight. Just one defense against Danny Williams.

    Wlad makes several mandatories, unifies, he is The Real Heavyweight Champion!