Vitali implies that Wladimir was drugged in his first fight with Brewster..

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RAMPAGE0017, Jul 8, 2007.


  1. RAMPAGE0017

    RAMPAGE0017 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,624
    16
    May 30, 2007
    " Wladimir proved that three years ago he lost to Brewster due to an outside influence. "

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=11612&more=1

    I've gotta say.... I still think Vitali is the better fight of the two brothers, but Vitali does seem awfully arrogant. :-(

    His brother is a breath of fresh air, really.
     
  2. RAMPAGE0017

    RAMPAGE0017 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,624
    16
    May 30, 2007

    Beating what dead horse? I never said Wlad was drugged, nor did I say Wlad didn't prove anything. Think before you type, please. :good


    My my.. Wlad nuthuggers are so touchy.
     
  3. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    I am not sure being 1-1 against a fighter proves you are better. I think Wlad is better myself. But that certainly is up for debate.
     
  4. RAMPAGE0017

    RAMPAGE0017 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,624
    16
    May 30, 2007


    Vitali brought it up, not me. And if you have a problem with this thread, I'd suggest you move on, turd-burglar.
     
  5. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    He accomplished more. But as far as who would beat who each time out, no one knows for sure. Thats a fact. Especially with McCall.
     
  6. DoumB

    DoumB HOYA KO1 PRESSCOT Full Member

    1,491
    0
    Sep 18, 2006
    no offense KG but it isnt debatalble, Klitschko is superior to brewster in every aspect, wich ever way u check the first fight, he was beating brewster badly b4 the stoppage, but still lost and completly dominated him the second time around
     
  7. RAMPAGE0017

    RAMPAGE0017 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,624
    16
    May 30, 2007

    Wow, you must be a Wlad nut-hugger of the severest order. If this is a sensitive subject to you, then you shouldn't have opened the thread. That's why I made the subject of this thread clear, so that nuthuggers could save themselves a restless night. :lol:
     
  8. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    Before this rematch, Wlad said he never accused Brewster, himself, of any wrongdoing in the first fight's strange outcome.

    But I think they suspect someone else may have done something, or had it done, for him. A certain fella with tall hair is whom I bet they are suspecting.

    And if that certain, suspected gentleman is capable of killing someone, he's certianly capable of hiring someone to slip something in a rival fighter's water bottles. LOL

    Who knows what did or didn't happen, but it was a very strange outcome, no question.
     
  9. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    He is the best HW today. But there is no alleged loss to Brewster. And his win here doesn't erase all the deficiencies that cost him that fight. I am not really sure where you are coming from there.

    A fighter with a good chin who can pressure Wlad has a shot at beating him. Everyone has their poison right?
     
  10. Shamrock

    Shamrock Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    Of course he was drugged 1st time round, and with that he has now proven he can make all other heavies look ordinary. Wlad is the greatest heavyweight since Lennox, and Lennox will be pleased he retired and doesn't need to step up to him.
     
  11. Jose FM

    Jose FM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,612
    1
    Apr 29, 2007
    Yeah but in both fights Klitschko was destroying Brewster, and youre only as good as your last fight. So the edge definately goes to Wlad, also even the most blatant Wlad haters admit that the first fight was kinda of a freak occurance, that Wlad was so spent after only 5 rounds.
     
  12. RAMPAGE0017

    RAMPAGE0017 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,624
    16
    May 30, 2007
    I'm not taking sides with either Wladimir OR Brewster, as a matter of fact, I've often given credit to Wladimir in the past. I created this thread to merely showcase the arrogance of Vitali. But you, in all your nut-hugging glory, took it the wrong way. And like many tight-assed Klitschko nut-huggers often do, you are getting your panties in a bunch over it. :patsch
     
  13. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Wlad was spent because of the way he was expending energy.

    And I don't think dominating Brewster up to that point really shows he is better. Why? Cuz that's been the way Brewster fights. He comes right at you and is there to be hit. He tries to wear you down then KO you. My point is he gets beaten up pretty good in every fight, ones he wins and ones he loses cuz of his style.

    I have never bought into you are only as good as your last fight. Wlad looked different then he ever has in their first fight. I concede that. I think Brewster looked different than he ever had last night as well.

    And I picked Wlad to win....I am just giving an opinion here.
     
  14. guillermojm

    guillermojm Member Full Member

    220
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    yea i wish they cought his ass and sent him to jail that ******* has his hands in everyones pocket its sick:verysad
     
  15. RAMPAGE0017

    RAMPAGE0017 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,624
    16
    May 30, 2007
    :lol: