Vitali implies that Wladimir was drugged in his first fight with Brewster..

That's the way I see it too. Things just didn't look right in the first fight. I have seen KOes before but this looked more like somebody dropping from fatigue or being sick than being KTFO. The coordination was still there but the energy to move was not. For all I know it could have been blood doping backfiring on him or somebody did spike his water bottle with something or a combination of being glazed in vaseline and punching himself out had something to do with it. Either way Brewster was lucky to get the win but at least he made the most out of it with his one round drubbing of Golota and a come from behind KO of Krasniqui.

 

Wlad would have definately gottem KO'd in the 7th round. He's lucky McGirt stopped the fight!

 

Exactly. Wlad's finger was broken, and Brewster's face about to bust up his entire hand, next.

 

Some folk are comparing both fights similar punch stats and wondering why Wladimir Klitschko didn't get tired this time around. The majority of his punches were jabs, that's why he didn't get tired. In the first fight Wlad was trying to decapitate him with power shots from the opening bell.

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

So the Sanders and Purrity fights never happened then? Not to mention the multiple knockdowns WALDO has suffered, despite never actually having fought anyone any good?

Damn you WALDO lovers make it too easy at times :deal

 

You can't be serious? How about 95% of the time those two have been in a ring Wlad has absolutely dominated him......does that clear up the debate?

 

No. It doesn't. Brewsters entire style is based on taking punishment. His win in the first one wasn't lucky. It's the same strategy he basically employs. It worked the first time and not the second time.

Again, read everything someone says. I said I think Wlad is the better fighter. But someone can certainly point out that they are 1-1 and that he is not definitively better until he beats him in a rubber match.

If Brewster was usually a dominant fighter from bell to bell, that would be one thing. But he isn't. He has been losing often in his high level matches before getting a KO. It's who he is (or was).

 

So he was strategically getting his ass whipped? That's a first even for guys who have been around boxing 31 years.

I guess it almost worked this time. Klitschko's hands couldn't take much more of the pounding Brewster's face was giving them~ if I can paraphrase Tex Cobb.

 

To be fair in this case it's VITLAY that's being a classless pole-smoker, but that's no more than you can expect from a man that stuttered 'I can f-f-f-f-fight on, I s-s-s-s-s-see real g-g-g-g-good' after the Lewis fight, with half his face hanging off :nut :nut :nut

Damn I give respect for WALDO avenging a defeat, but we all just knew this bull**** would start again, just like after every WALDO fight.

Oh and why oh ****ing WHY can't people just admit that Brewster knocked him the **** out the first time round, with hard left hooks??

 

Yah, thats what I said. atsch

Are you going to deny that Brewsters style is entirely predicated on his taking shots to get his own? Wlad has a very good offense and typically dishes out a lot of punishment. Brewster was prepared to take it the first time, not the second time.

I am saying that just because Wlad was winning the first fight handily means NOTHING. It's how Brewster fights...he will take a ton of punishment to get in position.

 

I can't admit Brewster KOed Klitschko because I didn't see the things that normally happen when a boxer is KTFO. No chicken dance, No Trevor Berbick-legs go one way, head goes the other flop. It just looked like somebody collapsing. Not a normal looking KO.

 

He was hurt by a couple of big shots and was on rubber legs just waiting to be KO'd. Reminded me of the way Hearns went down against Hagler.

Apologies for mentioning WALDO in the same sentence as 2 real fighters, by the way :hat