Vitali is better than wlad!

better stamina is the only one i disagree there. Vitali's stamina has always been iffy. But yea he has always been better than Wlad and I've always said it, I'm happy last night confirmed it emphatically.

 

they are both average, vitali slightly less so

 

i agree prime for prime but viyali is still rusty at present. so 50/50 imo.
​

 

I don't know about that.Better from an entertainment point of view I agree,but I like Wlad to beat Vitali,anyway like Vitali said:''I like zat belt''

 

It depends on who you match them up against. The more fluid and athletic Wlad would always do better against a boxer with fast hands like Chris Byrd, while Vitali will always do better against a tough fighter with a big punch and strong chin (Sam Peter or Corrie Sanders). Head to head I would take Vitali.

 

even against a boxer like Byrd, if Vitali doesn't get injured he would do better than Wlad

 

No. Vitali didn't dominate Byrd (before the injury occured) like Wlad did.
A lot of his punches missed which COULD be the reason for his shoulder injury.

 

I agree. I like Vitali much more then Wlad. Wlads a *****. Vitali isnt.

 

I am certainly more fond of him.

 

how is wlad a *****? Vitali is the one who quit on his stool vs a lightheavyweight with 2 rounds to go. Wlad is defintley better than vitali. better tools, more talent, wlads tougher too.

 

I always thought that from day one. Bring on Vitali-Golota!

 

Vitali knows he's better than his brother esp. against someone like Peter who would have certainly been in line for a Wlad rematch if he'd beaten Vitali.. Vitali didn't want that to happen--he knows Peter is a threat to Wlad-- so he ended that possibility. Sam will never have the opportunity again.
Vitali's the man.

 

Hi Derrick.

Remember this?

"I have absolutely no doubt Peter will KO Wlad within 2 rounds."