Vitali Klitschko: A KO Win Eliminates Bad Judges

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sponge, Oct 9, 2017.


  1. sponge

    sponge Active Member Full Member

    675
    188
    Jun 12, 2015
    But if you can knock out your opponents, you will never have problems with the judges... right there, a small and easy answer to that problem."

    -----------


    Plain and simple, GGG can do that.
    Not a problem for Canelo because he always win on the cards.
     
  2. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    it sure didnt eliminate his bad judges.
     
    Staminakills likes this.
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,568
    82,049
    Aug 21, 2012
    Easier said than done, even for GGG. Canelo is world class, and trying to force a KO on a really great opponent could end up in getting KO'd instead. That said, Golovkin can do it if anybody can.
     
  4. MrTombourineMan

    MrTombourineMan Торрейра хорошо. Full Member

    1,146
    2,063
    Apr 16, 2016
    Correct.
    Not so correct.
     
    pincai and Robney like this.
  5. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,528
    28,239
    Jan 18, 2010
    Ask Sexy Sergio how sure of a solution that is... corruption brakes for nobody!
     
  6. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,075
    6,790
    Jan 13, 2017
    Great advice from Vitali, stating the ****in obvious a bit
     
  7. sponge

    sponge Active Member Full Member

    675
    188
    Jun 12, 2015
    A KO won't eliminate bad judges, but it will eliminate bad decisions.
     
    Howitzer1888, pincai and Staminakills like this.
  8. pincai

    pincai The Indonesian Thin Man Full Member

    7,948
    10,477
    Jun 10, 2012
    What Vitali said is true but that's not the purpose of the sport of boxing, for nowadays anyway. Or else we will be back to the days of fight till the last man standing.
    A fighter should be able to go in the ring and be comfortable if it goes to the cards, to receive a fair ruling.
    Because of the subjective nature of the scoring system, some descrepancies are expected. Any deviation around 4 points is acceptable. Anything above that should be scrutinise.
     
    Birmingham likes this.
  9. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,528
    28,239
    Jan 18, 2010
    I disagree with your "swing point" opinion.

    Sometimes there is no or little option for swing points, like in the Matthysse vs Alexander fight for instance.
    Alexander edged the first couple of rounds before he got found out and got a brutal ass whooping, getting dropped along the way and having to hold on for dear life to make it to the final bell.
    Possible scorecards... either 95-94 or 96-93 Matthysse, despite it being extremely onesided in the second half of the fight. Clearly close on the cards but not in reality, because razor close rounds count the same as one in which a guy gets spanked. Everyone scored it close, but with Matty winning the last 5 rounds clearly including a KD, there was no way you could give it to Devon. But going with your 4 point deviation, the clear robbery wasn't a robbery at all.

    The fight itself decides how much deviation is possible. Some are extremely hard to score, and some extremely easy. Some you can have as much as 6 swing rounds, some maybe only a single one or even none at all.
     
    pincai likes this.
  10. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    7,694
    4,245
    Oct 30, 2016
    I wonder what judges Vitali will be targeting to eliminate?
     
  11. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    Wrong.

    Not allowing promoters to decide who will be the officials and judges for the fights, eliminates bad judges.
     
  12. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,030
    Sep 22, 2010
    he could start with his own that let him throw Donald around the ring without getting DQ.