The opinion that it makes sense is relative...that's my point. It makes sense to whomever shares that opinion. Think about it...is my suggestion.
http://de.eurosport.yahoo.com/boxen/fotos.html http://www.bild.de/BILD/sport/mehr-...-klitschko/trainiert-wie-rocky-im-schnee.html
I disagree. I feel that was just an excuse because people weren't used to seeing a fighter take it to Roy like that. Also, my backround in cutting weight doesn't allow me to buy into the nonsense. Fighters gain and lose weight before fights on a regular basis. Roy actually being light for Light Heavyweight makes the excuse even more absurd. RJJ certainly doesn't kill himself making 175.
I believe the reasoning is that Roy gained and lost muscle in a reasonably short space of time.We will never know the full extent of its effect or whether or not it had one atall.You have a case though
If he used "the clear" to bulk up, then it definitely makes sense. That was the rumour floating around at the time, wasn't it?
In reality... he only lost 7 pounds in 8 months. Water weight sure doesn't have anything to do with losing muscle. Also, I can assure you that he didn't have to lose 7 pounds of muscle either. People are just naive. As if all the sudden Roy became a real Heavyweight. The man was 7 pounds below the current cruiserweight limit for that fight.
Nobody here has said that.He had gained muscle mass though.We canagree there and we don't know for sure how many lbs he gained and lost(of muscle that is),its mostly just hearsay.We also don't know what effect/how much of an effect it had
Why is it that Vitali Klitschko threads always end up way off the original talking point? It is not the Klitschko fans that do it. :think