Vitali Klitschko is an unbeatable monster. He would beat any HW from any era

By your logic Ali never actually beat Henry Cooper. Henry Cooper floored Ali but because he lost on a cut he didn't lose right? Please explain what you think of Ali Cooper 1 and how Lewis-Klitschko is different.

 

they both took the fight on 10 days notice.

lewis was training to fight johnson.

vitali was training to fight boswell on the undercard for that fight.

the timing favoured vitali imo.

 

If you are so unbeatable and all then how do you lose two fights ?

 

I would not say he is unbeatable but I don't think any boxer is but Vitali has never been outclassed in a boxing ring something that is very rare.

Besides maybe Lewis and Wladimir and maybe a prime Bowe I can't think of to many boxers all time that could hang in there with Vitali. Whats the blue print on beating Vitali? So far it is creating a cut or injuring his shoulder. He has never realy been close to being behind in a fight or close to being knocked out.

 

Vitaly got a old Lewis who weighed more then he had ever weighed.

 

no...by his logic vitali lost to ross purrity...

& even tho the official result says vitali by tko...the stoppage on on cuts is an unacceptable result...& there was no rematch. :deal

 

Prime Mike Tyson would make him miss jabs/ punches all night it's byebye when Tyson uses his boxing skills and not just agression, I bet Tyson would stop Vitali within 4, and Wlad in 2 :good

 

The rules are the rules, losing a fight because of a cut is losing a fight, period!!
Plenty of examples in sports history where it's tough to accept winners because of circumstances. Losing a soccer game on penalties after you dominated the whole game, sucks, but it is still a lost game (plenty of examples of that happening).

I see Vitali giving just about any HW trouble, including the top names, but to say he's unbeatable and would win any fight against historic HW's just isn't accurate imo.

 

:rofl brilliant

 

Lewis TKO 6:deal

 

Please, 40 year old Vitali schools any version of Lewis. Wake up!

 

There is no evidence Vit can be beat bar the injury, none. All these years in the ring there wasn't a single fighter who was not outclassed and schooled by Vitali, including Lewis.

 

He should have stopped Buster and Holyfield first :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

I said PRIME you idiot, two totally different boxer's we are talking about here

 

Well precisely. There seems to be a distinct lack of thought when the 'Vitali never lost to Lewis' argument comes up. What if a fighter is behind on points and knocks out his opponent - is that not really a win either? Such as Ali vs Lyle or Chavez vs Taylor?

What is a stoppage by cut exactly? It's a stoppage induced by a blow or blows that render an opponent incapable of continuing the contest due to physical damage sustained as a result of those blow(s).

What is a KO exactly? As in a complete knockout cold? It's a stoppage induced by blows or blows that render an opponent incapable of continuing the contest due to physical damage sustained as a result of those blow(s).

A KO is unconsciousness induced by massive physical trauma on the brain, i.e. physical injury. A stoppage on a cut is damage to tissue, again, physical injury.

There is NO difference. Both stoppages are a result of physical damage caused by blows received.

Really now, logic dictates that this argument needs to be left aside, otherwise any stoppage victory won by a fighter who was behind can be called 'not really a victory' Clearly this is absurd. Case closed.