Really? So sanders, peter, arreola, chisora were not good opponents? Man just log off cause you acting like a ******ed poster. Get out of here man.
That tranlates to "Please look at it yourself, I can't sleep since Saturday. Someone took victory away from me. Vitali God dam, can't you live since Lewis, I can't live with it either. We have to box." If Vitali doesn't fight Haye I hope we see Haye v Charr or Wlad v Charr.
You might be right, but a charr bum is no ali or foreman, this is a fact you must understand, or dont you?:thumbsup
Bull****, it was a legit knockdown, just like the knockdown Vitali had against Solis. You guys will never give it up...............
Charr started coming on and then Vitali slashed him Lewis style. Charr can still come around though,he is far from done and he was not dpominated either with those arm punches. The knockdown was a balance shot anyway,Charr wasnt hurt in the least.
No, they were not particularly good. Sanders had 1 win over a top 10 fighter in his entire career and was stopped by Nate Tubbs. Peter was crude and struggled with a fat blown up ex-middleweight. Arreola, no top 10 wins. Chisora was a 17 fight novice and was exposed when he fought a decent fighter who wasn't injured. What exactly is good about all that?
Peter was the wbc champion in which vitali went straight to him after a 4 year retirement and not only beat peter but destroyed peter so badly that peter quit. The same peter that gave wlad hell in the first fight. Yes he struggle vs toney in the first fight but in the rematch peter easily beat toney. Arreola is easily far better then charr and vitali easily destroyed him like nothing. Chisora yeah easily beat helenius but i dont want to hear helenius excuse cause vitali beat chisora with 1 good arm. And whats good of that? Well to beat the first 3 top 10 heavyweights in peter, gomez, arreola after a 4 year layoff is pretty impressive to say the least.