Vitali Klitschko, STOP being a *****!

:hi:

 

Get real, Peter was a paper champion who got a vacant title over a guy who hadn't been a serious contender in years. He was crude and unskilled. His "tough" fight with Wlad is only because little brother was trying to play it safe after having his chin cracked just a couple fights earlier. Peter is a NOBODY in the annals of boxing. And you can spin Chisora any way you want but the fact remains he was a novice with one decent win over another novice. Should I even bring up Tyson Fury? Please!

 

Yeah you mean chisora who fought fury weigh in at 264 pounds? Please.

 

Stop being a dumb a$$ for real

 

Yep that's right. The very same guy who made the immature and NOVICE mistake of coming in fat against another novice and who was still very inexperienced against any kind of quality competition. By the way, I noticed you don't want to touch on crude Sam Peter any more. Good boy, you're learning! :good

 

I did touch on it since i said youre a dumb a$$ because of you making a bs excuse of why peter gave wlad trouble in the first fight.

 

No, you're not touching on it because Peter would have been a club fighter in most era's and you want to pass him off as a "world champion" to enhance your point. What was Peter's biggest win? It was a fat, old, ex-middleweight, right? You can avoid and spin all you want, but Vittles resume stinks!

 

whatever

 

"I know you are, but what am I?"

Lord, I just love ESB arguments !

 

how about ***** at the ***s who went into def con 5 because they never expected blood in a heavyweight title fight. its sad when they dont even ask the guy if he can see, nor allow his corner time to work on it nor give him a round or 2 to go for broke....
charr was garbage from day one, but let it go a few rounds for the champ at least and the people that paid, he had "a" cut , not an eyeball falling out.

 

His resume isnt great but it isnt stink. Only you a dumb a$$ would think so. Peter wasnt a great fighter but he was a good fighter that was the favorite to beat wlad in the first fight remember? Who yeah i forgot you say the reason it was a tough fight cause wlad wanted to be more safe? Lmfao. Again beating peter/gomez/arreola was pretty impressive considering all 3 or maybe 2 were top 10 heavyweight in the world back then but of course u wont mention that cause again you're a dumb a$$. And those 3 i mention would have beat charr.

 

Charr is a ****ing moron if he thinks he can just cruise through the first 10 rounds behind his high guard and eat 1,000 punches without risking getting cut. Now he's crying.

Uhm... maybe protect yourself better instead of stopping punches with your face??

 

Hey Larry, Where should Vitali v.s. Charr II be taken place? Lebanon?

BTW, Are you Charr's relative?

 

hope it never happens ..

lets make charr vs chisora, this could be fun
they are both not world class at this point of carrear,
lets get it on.

 

First off, if you're going to call someone else "dumb" you should really learn how to speak properly. Second, being the betting favorite means absolutely nothing, we're talking about skill and resume. And AGAIN, Peter's best win was a tough fight against a fat ex-middleweight. Am I wrong? What's next, would you like to discuss the fine skills of Sam Peter?

Since you're so insistent on using rankings to justify Arreola and Gomez as good opponents lets talk a little about how they got there. Gomez best win was against a 42 year old crackhead who's best win was more than a decade earlier. And remind me, hadn't Gomez already been knocked out by the all time great Yanqui Diaz in 1 round? Who exactly did Arreola beat? Was it McCline, Walker or Witherspoon that got him his ranking? :yep

Now it would be foolish to just look at the resumes of Vits opponents before he fought them, so lets look after he fought them to. With you're infinite knowledge about boxing would you please tell me what top 10 fighters Peter, Gomez or Arreola has beaten since losing to Vittles?

Face is son, the era stinks and so does Vitaly's resume.