If a shorter fighter whose only advantage seems to be slightly better speed is behind 4 points after three rounds, he is getting ****ed up. Charr looked like he could land a few punches when he attacked suddenly because Vitali is slowing down with age. That advantage would have diminished over the rounds. Charr doesn't have the power or workrate to grind down someone like Vitali late. Hiw win wasn't stolen since nothing in that fight suggested he could win.
Vitali has never tired out in a fight in his career. so it makes sense to be confident he would have tired out? Nothing to base that on. He was setting the pace, his pace. The fight would have only ended with Vitali winning. I understand wanting it to go on. I did too. It seemed premature. However, Charr struggled with weak opposition in the past. He is no world beater,
Vits was tired in both the Byrd and Lewis fights by the fifth round. Charr is a horrible fighter and never had a chance to begin with. On top of that though, his strategy sucked. Vitaly isn't going to tire himself out, you have to force him out of his comfort zone and make him tense. If he can control the fight with little resistance than you simply can't win. In the immortal words if Micky from the "Rocky" movies you have to "go fight this guy hard!" to take his wind away.
Vitali Klistscho is the champion of bums and green fighters, , all his stupid fans love to see him beat bums and green fighters and pack out shitty stadiums in Germany and claim hes an all time great. Vitali Klistscho will only be remembered for his loss to Lewis (TK0 6) his resume is utter dog shite. The era is weak and pathetic, the only challenge out there is Haye fight him or retire and do boxing a favour, the fight against charr was an abomination to the heavyweight title the Klistschos have no shame, holyfield would of been a better fight. :hammertime:hammertime:hammertime