I know. It’s a bit daft. These are better; prime whyte vs …. prime Chisora Prime mark Skelton Prime Sam Samil Sam (turkey) Prime (ppl can’t remember too well as they didn’t win world titles)
Not sure on that one. I'd be more confident of him beating Zhang. But no idea. One thing's for sure Itauma would destroy Whyte in no time
What an embarrassing thread. Vitali is one of the greatest heavyweights of all time. This wouldn't even be a contest as Whytes fundamentals are just awful. Also, the Chisora that fought an old Vitali was far better than any version of Whyte. That was one of the very few occasions when Chisora actually prepared properly for a fight in his prime.
A still very fresh, not yet stopped Chisora went the distance with a literally last on his legs Vitali. Vitali that melted Kirk Johnson would've stopped Chisora. Regarding Vitali/Whyte, The Vitali that fought Chisora would've UD12 Whyte, a younger version would've stopped him in under 9 rounds
Not sure of the question, but 2012 Vitali beats Whyte by UD. 2004 Vitali stops him; it's a mismatch. I voted based on this being the Vitali in his final year (as I'm guessing that was probably the question).
Dr Feather Fist would prove that Fury actually hits harder than him as he takes an excruciating 10 rounds to get a ref stoppage.
45 wins - 41 KO's Literally one of the highest KO ratios of all time lol. Don't get the 40yr old Vitali confused with the prime version.
lol! This poll will be as one sided as Loma vs Rigo Vitali by absolute beatdown. A worn out Whyte gets dropped for a ten count around 8.