Vitali Klitschko won every single fight but 1 (ONE) by knockout. Great percentage.

WTF was the point of that??? Does that make the bums he fought better??? Or the fact that he lost to the two best fighters he faced different???

 

still sticking with yout "result is all that matters" arguement. :-(

 

Are you agreeing or is that your idea of disputing what I said?

 

You're on at an odd time, Farmy.

 

They matter more than percentages, that's for sure.

 

Ask the greatest gridiron team of all time and world champion New England Patriots.

Or ask President Thomas Dewey.

 

I thought it was one of the best posts you have ever had here. It sounds like you are/were a disappointed VK fan. Which is great that even his fans can see that his resume was crap. The Honest and TRUE fans. Sackswingers will try and sell it as he fought the best fighters availible or some crap like that.

 

They were winning and lost by injury? :yikes

 

Tony Tubbs used to train with the Klitschkos, he can tell some really awesome things about Vitali's ability, esp. his awesome right hand.

 

I said "I don't know why" meaning I haven't seen the reason to stop the fight, not the fight itself.

 

So was Francesco Damiani

So was Frank Bruno

So was Jorge Gonzalez

I have no idea who else won that

I couldn't care less who else won those.

 

They share with Vitali the distinction of having lost the big one.

 

So Chris Byrd is a "better" boxer than Vitali? That's what some may assume by the result.

 

well personally i believe that although the Giants are the superbowl champs, the patriots had an overall better team.

The Giants were better when it mattered, but hey, sometimes the overall better team loses. Thats the reality of sports.

 

The result and his entire career. Byrd has the more impressive resume.