This content is protected :think Can he walk through Asda Price's punches, like he did VS Helenius And Vitlay???:think
Tell you what G$ora has a Chin and he is an exciting fighter and personality. If he comes into the Haye fight in top shape I think he will wear Haye down with pressure and stop him. That is if Haye is not on his bike the whole fight. I think I saw where Epix is picking up that fight so we will be able to see it in the States. If Chisora wins I have no problem with him getting a crack at Wlad early next year provided Wlad gets by Thompson and Arreloa which he should. :good
The Klitschko's are running out of opponents and fast. If Wlad gets by Thompson and Arreloa who is is a credible opponent? :think G$ora would be right up there coming off a Haye win...... Only problem is G$ora and his team need to have a Plan B if Haye tries to back peddle and pot shot the whole fight which is entirely possible.
You're alright knockout artist. :hat Sanders beating Cooper was irrelevant to what's being said here. Sanders is a Cooper level fighter. He wasn't avoided, considering how stacked the 90s was it's immediately clear that he simply wasn't good enough to be on anybody's radar. Rahman, a terribly inconsistent fighter, proved that.
Rahman knocked out Lewis so loss to Rahman proves nothing unless you are trying to argue that Lewis was "a Cooper level fighter" as well. Besides, Rahman did not KO Sanders - Sanders ran out of gas and referee stopped it.
Running out of opponents?:think Potvetkin Mitchell Helenius Pulev Boystov Chisora(for Wlad) Johnson(for Wlad) Haye(for Don Vito) Chambers(for Don Vito) Adamek(for Wlad) Price(2013-2014) Fury(2013-2014) Glaskov Wach Szpilka(if his chin hold up) Mago(if he gets a defense) Welliver Rodriguez(fighting Quezada next and Lawrence/Oquendo/Ibragimov after) Not saying all these guys are gonna stay healthy and continue winning at the higher levels, but if half stay where they're at or get better and continue progressing......plenty to choose from and we have even touched on the next crop.:huh
Rahman was a 20:1 underdog against Lennox Lewis because he was widely regarded as a 2nd tier fighter. Sanders losing to Rahman simply affirms that he was never that good to begin with anyway.
:nono Lewis-Rahman 2 was 2 to 1. Rahman was a live underdog. Besides, Sanders would have been much more dangerous fight for Lewis given his questionable chin.
The first fight wasn't 2 to 1. Sanders would not have been a dangerous fight for Lewis, given his questionable skills.