Granted that fans do tend to go overboard, I'd say Corrie did hit very, very hard. I believe that a successful knockout puncher must have the following : speed, accuracy, power, combinations and stamina to throw them consistently round after round, without diminishing results. Corrie had the first 3, lacked in the later 2. His fight against Rahman was used as an example before, but for some unknown reason, people are acting as if Rahman was the same throughout his career. The guy was a beast in his prime and took on some monstrous shots in his career. I believe Lennox ruined him in their second fight, but prior to that Rahman was a very solid fighter with an above average chin, good defence and very heavy hands. Maskaev got him much the same way Marquez gets to Pac - just perfectly matched styles. As for Vitali's chin, I think the best way to judge a boxer's mandible is by how worried you get about him when he is in the ring. I've never been worried about Vitali Klitschko getting knocked out, ever. Even in his blockbuster fight with Lennox, with his face ripped to shreds, he looked like he was going to hold on and stay on his feet - to me, that means great chin. We can go into polemics and try to analyze who took heavier shots, and from whom, but the truth of the matter is, all of that is subjective. Sometimes you have to go with your gut feeling.
This is kind of like when people argue about Mayweathers chin. Their chins cannot be argued as the best of all time simply because they don't get hit often. Them not being down in their careers is as much because of their skill as because of their chin. They dont get hit repeatedly and when they do their chin is good enough to stand the occasional heavy blow that gets through.
There are too many Klitschko fanatics on this forum. I thought most of them left but there seems to be a significant portion of them still remaining.
I interned for Schulenburg during the summer and have a job waiting for me upon graduation so fock your advise. Apparently they were impressed by my performance thus the promise of a job once I graduate. Seriously I don't think I want to be taking advice from a wannabee intellectual. b. I thought it was a waste my time replying to the three other points because they're boxing related and its quite obvious to those who know a few things about the sport that you don't know **** about boxing even though you think you do so why go through the hassle. Now as for the salary of teachers. My goodness it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that you're full of **** with those numbers.All it takes is a quick google search of high school teachers salary to find out how wrong you're. You know what, don't even worry with the hazel I will help you out . Here are the figures from Bureau of Labor and Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-tra...hers.htm#tab-5. Those figures includes periods when teachers are off such as breaks and summer vacation. Seriously I'm not surprised that your fraudulent wannabee educator ass didn't even know that. For the salary of postsecondary educators which you claim to be a part of. Here are the numbers from the Bureau of Labor and statistics.http://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-tra...hers.htm#tab-5. Isn't obvious those are not even close to the figures your fraudulent ass posted. In a department only a tiny minority of the faculty make those kind of numbers. Mostly the chair of the department and some distinguished veteran faculty member who in most cases are almost towards retirement. The two other areas where you will find post secondary educators making those type of salary are in Ivy league institutions or in law school departments where median salary of their faculties are well over six figures. Quit lying there is no paper. If there was you could have easily attached a pdf copy of it or simply wrote what the title of the paper was.
I know you're a Klits fan and it pains you to know the truth, but I have to say it Foreman. Seriously the truth needs to be said. Take your time its gonna be alright boo-boo.:hi: