Vitali vs Frazier

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SJS19, Sep 8, 2012.


  1. Boom1989

    Boom1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,102
    0
    Mar 26, 2011
    Byrd wasn't too small to make Vitali quit.
     
  2. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    You mean like Foreman looked 'slow' compared to 'fast' Frazier?
     
  3. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Even Foreman throws punches faster than Vitali, and at least they aren't arm punches. Vitali might have some chance versus that Frazier, anyhow.
     
  4. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    I know, these nostalgic folks haven't got a clue. :good
     
  5. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Vitali would land often & accurately, like he always does. Frazier would be KO'd by the 10th if he made it that far.
     
  6. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Lol, you guys with your lack of any kind of analysis and just going by the size argument make me laugh. He couldn't blow out little feather fisted Byrd so that lame argument holds no merit. How about discussing the styles match up, which is what it really comes down to?
     
  7. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    It's all about size here,and much as it pains me to say it,Joe's style isn't suited to fighting guys at 18 stone and 6"7.
    I love Joe but I can't see how he gets by that jab and make his way in to do damage.
     
  8. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    good post
     
  9. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  10. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Ali's jab was 10x better than Vits and he got by that.
     
  11. JAB5239

    JAB5239 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,470
    58
    Feb 23, 2008
    Actually its the guys who hug on nuts and cry size all day who really don't have a clue.
     
  12. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    I wouldn't dispute that if I was riddled with schizophrenia,but I just think most of the old school HW's would find similar problems that smaller guys who used to fight Tommy Hearns had.Nothing to do with ability,it's more a law of physics thing as I see it.
    I know Haye overcame Valuev,but I'd worry for Joe that either of K2 would neutralise his best weapons purely by keeping him away.
    Only my opinion though.I'd love to see any good argument which makes a case for Joe winning as it would be a preferable scenario for me.
     
  13. NoCoolFool?

    NoCoolFool? Active Member Full Member

    833
    2
    Apr 1, 2006
    Well, three rounds finished in V.Klit - Charr. I understand that Vitali is a bit past his best...and he wouldn't use the same hands-down style vs Frazier without being cut to shreds...he just doesn't look good to me. Definitely not in the same class as his brother. And there is nothing there that shows me that Frazier wouldn't give Vitali a LOT of problems.

    oh...it's over. Wow...horrible show.
     
  14. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    8,710
    27
    Jun 1, 2012
    I don't think KO1, but frazier wouldn't win.
     
  15. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,257
    38,029
    Aug 28, 2012
    Vitaly would bounce Frazier around the ring the same as Foreman did. He's just way too strong and big. It might be a different story if Frazier was a little taller, faster, or had a longer reach, if he had a granite chin and was known for amazing conditioning and stamina, but he's not.