Don't be blinded by Charr's lack of aggression in the first two rounds. His plan was clearly to use the Philly shell & Take Vitali into the later rounds, then start unleashing his pown bombs. He was actually doing so a little in the third, and a LOT in the fourth, driving Vitali backwards & connecting with a few very good punches. There is no question that Vittles cheated his way out of that predicament. NONE. Whether Charr could have won or not doesn't really matter, what matters is that he was doing well enough that the aging Vitali wanted to get the **** out of there. So if you think Charr is a tomato can, what does that make (today's) Vitali?
vitaly is legit. my only concern for vitaly is injuries. if his bodies holds up idc if hes 42 years old he dominates stiverne with ease. its not even close.