ive no idea where your going with this...if you think vitalis defence is flawed point it out to me...
hes draining me because we are having a conversation about him..even though you and i no fine rightly who im refering to
They never do tests. Not many real deeds either. Sure, a conversation with your grandmother's shade in a darkened room; but comes a doubter; well, the planets are not in line, the entrails are not favorable, we don't do tests!!!!!!!
same to you bro, didn't know where you were going with that tyson comment. I made that 2004 vs. 1987 tyson comment because of something bubby said, and you jumped in. i'm equally, if not more perplexed. in the meantime, I don't think his defense is bad. I can say that he definitely benefits from huge physical advantages, not taking anything away from him.
of course his physical advantages help him..if he didnt have them he wouldnt be able to be as awkward..i just think the fact his defence was that good against chisora combined with the fact he had no jab (which is a big part of his defence/offence) people have to be impressed with it..i know i was..and im not a big vitali fan i prefer wlad more of the two..and im not saying chisora is some sort of atg..but his defenceive display has to be admired (by boxing lovers only ofcourse)