Vitali's resume is packed to the brim with Baldomir-level opponents

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bane, Sep 24, 2012.


  1. seansanashee

    seansanashee Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,658
    568
    Nov 27, 2010
    Tomasz Adamek had a massive reputation going into his fight with Vitali. Vitali went and fought him in Wroclaw, Poland. After Vitali destroyed him, he got very little recognition for it. You could easily argue that was a better win than Wlad's win against Haye.
     
  2. Bane

    Bane Let the games begin Full Member

    958
    0
    Aug 20, 2012
    Adamek has shown himself to be an average heavyweight and I don't think anyone would deny this - he was a an elite LHW and a very good cruiser, but he doesn't cut it at HW. Arreola was a good win for him but it was clear from the opening bell he wasn't really fit to be in the ring with Vitali, and 12 round decisions of the likes of Kevin McBride, Nagy Aguilera and a very very dubious 'victory' over a one armed chambers don't really change that.

    Adamek had a rep as a warrior going into the fight, but not as a a threat.
     
  3. vnyc

    vnyc Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,078
    638
    Nov 8, 2009
    brittards are here
     
  4. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Adamek is an average HW in this era of the K brothers. Mind you an average Michael Moorer was boxing at HW in the so-called 'great' 90s and won the IBF strap.

    IMO Adamek is just as good or bad as Moorer. Moorer would be a good have been a good win for Vitali's record and so is Adamek.
     
  5. stanislove12

    stanislove12 Active Member Full Member

    818
    1
    Feb 8, 2012
    i agree with TS to some extent, the competition isn't the best... yet the one thing to consider is how easily vitaly beats all of them, if the compotition fought eachother (in some cases they did) it would be a close afair and some times a mini war. I've never seen Arrola vs Admek but from what i heared (and i could be wrong) it was a close afair with a lot of action, yet vitaly made both of them look like below average. Vitaly recieved the most hate for his last two fights... yet he dominated both opponenets (Chisora and Charr) and i bet both of these guys won't be an easy fight for the rest of the heavy's.

    Briggs was a decent win, but Briggs was too old and too out of shape, however i beileve Briggs would be a difficult fight for most heavys due to his heavy hands and above average counter punching ability. Peter was a decent fighter before he got destroyed... Vitali handled peter (who isn't a world beater, but never the less a dangerous opponenet) fairly easily even though he was coming out of retirmenent and had to shake quiet a bit of ring rust. Vitaly did lose to Byrd and Lennox but even then those fights were very competitive and he gave both of them all they can handle.

    Anyways back to the main point. I would say most opponenets are average level fighters and would consider anywhere from C-B level opposition, the only A+++ level opponenet Vitaly ever faced would be Lewis and we all know how that went so no need to argue about it.

    The funny thing is if Vitaly didn't make people look so ordinary we could have pottnetially had a very competitive division with people arguing about how good Chisora is or how good Tyson Furry is comparing them to Lennox Lewis, Evander, Mike Tyson.

    P.S. sorry about poor spelling and grammer.
     
  6. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    Moorer was a far better fighter than Adamek in almost every department.

    A superior fighter with a better record he was a better LHW & a better HW.
     
  7. BoxingFan2010

    BoxingFan2010 Boxing Addict banned

    6,055
    1
    Jul 10, 2010
    Just a very very Stupid Original Poster and Thread! :deal

    End Of Story. No More Needs To Be Said.
     
  8. Bane

    Bane Let the games begin Full Member

    958
    0
    Aug 20, 2012
    Whoa that list of top class wins you listed has put me in my place.

    Boy is my face red

    :scaredas:
     
  9. BoxingFan2010

    BoxingFan2010 Boxing Addict banned

    6,055
    1
    Jul 10, 2010
    No need to argue with an idiot, when the idiot is wrong. :deal
     
  10. Bane

    Bane Let the games begin Full Member

    958
    0
    Aug 20, 2012
    Firstly I heavily disagree that Adamek = Moorer. Moorer was better and had a better record.

    Secondly, no Adamek doesn't look average because he's in the Kbros era...he was a contender because he was in the Kbros era.

    Thirdly....if Adamek, who can ONLY be a 'good' or 'decent' win on Vitalis record is the person being put forth and used as an example of why his resume isn't poor, then it's definitely in bad shape
     
  11. Bane

    Bane Let the games begin Full Member

    958
    0
    Aug 20, 2012
    I'll take your advice and make this my last reply to you, Boxingfansince2010.
     
  12. ElCep

    ElCep Guest

    I don't want to dwell or analyse his career that much. I'd just rather move on now the that K1 era looks to have started coming to an end. Thankfully.
     
  13. Tramell

    Tramell Hypocrites Love to Pray & Be Seen. Mathew 6:5 Full Member

    4,474
    3,857
    Sep 21, 2012

    Great post. Take K2 out the picture and the HW division is competitive with each other, just not against 2 dudes who can jab from across the ring.
    Funny thing is, I can't really think of an era where there were more than 3 very good Hw's at one time.
    During Joe Louis reign, the men were off to war, so he had the BUM-OF-The-Month-Club like TwoTon Galenta or an undersized Billy Conn who took him to the brink. Who did Marciano have? old timers? Who did Liston have? an undersized Floyd Patterson who wouldn't even be a Cruiserweight today.
    And Ali fought guys who all beat each other.
    Ken Norton won the title beating who? and lost it to who? Yup a sparring partner of Ali named Holmes who fought 20 average joes during his reign. Renaldo Snipes, a 16-0 Carl Williams whew, or a 10-0 Marvis Frazier, wow, what a resume..and George got his azz kicked by a 20-5 -2 Jimmy Young after the Ali fight.
    Lets not even talk about the 1980's where HW's handed the belt to each other like an American politician handing out bailout dollars to corporations. Trevor Berbick, Pinklon Thomas, Tony Tucker, Bonecrusher Smith...would those dudes have posed a fight to Vitali or Wladimir?
    90's?
    Tua dropped Moorer with a grazing shot in 20 seconds,,,& Moorer would survive a K2 shot? Tua fought like a coward against Lewis,..and he would have grown a pair against a chernobyl experiment?

    Facts are facts- The HW division has never been an allstar division rather a division where we are fortunate enough to see one allstar player every 10 or so years and hope...hope they can find one nemesis.
    And if it were the years of Jack Dempsey....heck you had to be the right color to fight him...so K2 should not be blamed for making the foes look so normal, they would have done that in any era- BAR the top two? of each decade from 1900-2000 K2 defeats all but about 5-10 fighters...thats not alot in a 100 years of boxing.:cool:
     
  14. BoxingFan2010

    BoxingFan2010 Boxing Addict banned

    6,055
    1
    Jul 10, 2010
    I have been watching boxing for over 34 years. I will not debate with an individual
    that has made his mind up on baseless, misconstruction of the facts. To debate with
    such an individual would be a waste of time and effort. Except my statement for what
    it is or do not! I could not care less either way.
     
  15. BoxingFan2010

    BoxingFan2010 Boxing Addict banned

    6,055
    1
    Jul 10, 2010
    Good Post :good