Vitali's resume is packed to the brim with Baldomir-level opponents

You try to act all sensible and balanced, but we know the truth. You're a klittard, and an over-emotional one at that. Remember when you sent me this private message . . .

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

No he wasn't. He was just as average as Adamek. Glass-chinned, too.

 

best post in this thread an exactly on point

 

He was a far better fighter than Adamek, MM was a badass LHW who was bombed out by 2 monsterous punchers in Foreman & Tua.

Adamek had better feet, was a bit more durable & thats it. Moorer beat much better competition & achieved a lot more than Adamek.

Anyone without a -ski at the end of their name knows he was far superior

 

Seriously, let's stop this BS. Tell me *EXACTLY* what made Moorer better than Adamek?

Moorer stuggled with bums like Schulz (who was destroyed by a 22 year old Wlad) and Adamek struggled with bums like Arreola who was schooled and punished by a 37 year old Vitali. There is nothing .. absolutely nothing.. that makes Moorer superior to Adamek.

Whenever Moorer faced top level competition at HW he was put in his place. Just like Adamek. I think the analogy is spot on.

Vitali would have destroyed Moorer just as one-sidedly as he did with Adamek. Moorer wouldn't have landed a single punch just like Averagemek.

 

And on what ****ing level was Michael Moorer then? David Haye?

Haye would demolish Moorer it would be painful to watch. Even a fat Povetkin would put a boxing clinic on Moorer and TKO him in the later rounds. Christ this is getting funny. Moorer would be nothing else in today's division but a guy sitting somewhere between Adamek and Povetkin in the rankings, a big step underneath Haye and a couple of lightyears below both brothers.

 

You are an odd penny.

 

:rofl prime Moorer >
























Version Tua and Wlad fought. Why is it so hard for some of you pinheads to understand? Past his prime Lewis, supermiddleweight Byrd, and always exciting Sanders RIP were fighters of the prior generation to the present one and they beat the Klits and some lost against the Klits. Just shows how much more competitive it used to be. Adamek and Haye my ass they belong in cruiserweight and wouldn't dare go to heavyweight with a prime Holyfield, Bowe, Lewis, Sanders, Tua, Rahman, McCall, Moorer, or Mercer around. AHAHAHAHA!!! Nucca please.

 

- Byrd
- Tua
- Holyfield in the early '00s
- Rahman
- Chagaev
- Valuev
- Thompson
- Haye (instead of ****ing Charr!!!)
- Ibragimov
- Brewster
- Liahkovic
- Chambers
- Brock
- McCline
- Povetkin


Each and every name on that list would easily rank among Vitali's top 3 wins (Sanders, Hide, Adamek). It's a bit difficult to lure opponents in the ring when offering slave contracts I suppose. It's easier to accuse them of ducking afterwards though.

If Vitali had fought and beat half of the names on that list, his resume would've improved 5-fold. The fact that Wlad has a good bunch of them on his resume is entirely irrelevant.

 

Povetkin has a much better resume than Vitali. Fact!

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

I don't think anyone has ever considered Adamek a true HW let alone a good one. Haye is far more proven.
But it depends on what Adamek achieves next. I hope he faces Haye at some point, I can see Haye going through him inside 3 rounds easily.

 

It seems to me that those that you've mentioned went on to do jack **** in this supposed **** era. Why exactly would they have added to V. Klitschko's legacy again? It's also quite ironic that you've added two Adamek victims there.