Vito Antuofermo vs. Mustafa Hamsho

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vince Voltage, Aug 13, 2011.


  1. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,073
    1,296
    Jan 1, 2011
    They fought in the same era, but never met in the ring. Very similar styles and arch rivals of Marvin Hagler. Who takes this fight? I think it could go either way, but my gut tells me Hamsho is a little tougher and would edge Vito in 12. But what do you guys think?
     
  2. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,787
    11,382
    Aug 22, 2004
    Strictly because of size, I would lean toward Hamsho. Tough, rugged, dirty fight for both, but Vito was a little on the small side for a middlweight (he made a comeback in the mid-80's as a junior-middle), while Hamsho was a very strong, more natural 160-pounder. Plus he hit a little harder, for whatever that's worth in a fight like this.
     
  3. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    Vito was better defensively, and had quicker hands. Neither had anything to trouble the other with in terms of punching power. "They're only southpaws until you get 'em inside," was a favorite saying of Antuofermo's, and he showed more than once that he could deal with southpaws. Of course there was Hagler I and Minter I, where both opponents could be argued as superior to Mustafa. In March 1974, John L. Sullivan was a 22-0-0 up and coming southpaw MW when Vito battered him with right leads and right-left combinations en route to a virtual ten round shutout. On the negative side of the ledger, he did lose those back to backs to southpaws Wissenbach and Hope in 1976, but Wissenbach was an eight rounder in the German's native Berlin, and he was reportedly weight drained for Hope (who can be argued for as superior to Hamsho anyway).

    Hamsho did beat Curtis Parker twice, and Parker is probably the closest infighting opponent to Vito stylistically that the rugged Syrian took on his his career, but Parker wasn't in the same class with Antuofermo.

    Take cuts out of the equation, and my best guess is that Vito gets under Mustafa's lefts, inside, then can out-quick Hamsho with shorter punches at close quarters, but I wouldn't put money on it. Nobody ever took a decision over prime Hamsho, but unlike Czyz and Parker, I think Antuofermo had the physical strength necessary to stand up to Mustafa.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,730
    44,267
    Apr 27, 2005
    I agree with Duo. Vito for me is simply the better fighter. I can't see Hamsho's arm punches cutting him, just have to watch the butts.
     
  5. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    an extreme test for Vito. Hamsho thrived on top competition

    sorry but too many variables in this one so I wouldnt touch it. its anyone's guess
     
  6. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    The last time this one came up, I said it would come down to who inflicts the most damaging cut. Both combatants were prone to cutting.
     
  7. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,073
    1,296
    Jan 1, 2011
    Good answers, guys. It's a shame this never happened...would've been sloppy as all hell but entertaining.