What does it prove? It proves that in his last fight his workrate was at an all time high. The very opposite of being in decline. You dont really know why you said he has declined ,probably just to argue with me , and now you're stuck in a corner not knowing where you are.
You've gone off track to the point you dont know what you're arguing against. You had no answer so you brought up Kevin Johnson. This is why ive ignored you in the past. You're a clueless teenager that posts like Bert Sugar on your own but in a debate prove you know **** about boxing.
Band up with a fraud whos been watching box a few years. He's definitely your suit. Have fun consolidating each other.
Do you care to reference a quote wherein Steward dismissed all the fighters I listed? Or are you too busy keeping track of who is and isn't logged in?
Silly Ballyhoo for a fight no one thought would be competitive. Why wasn't Chisora ranked higher than those I mentioned?
A panel of 20 experts with no money in the fight, many who are known in these parts, picked 12-8 in favor of a Peter victory (including our beloved Adam Pollack). It's on b o x i n g s c e n e.com. For some reason, I can't post the link. The point being Peter was seen by experts, by people who make money in the field, as a major threat in the division, someone nobody wanted their charge to face.
Peter was a sparring partner for Wlad, he knew him inside and out. The guy was useless. Steward himself said it. You know it and i know it. You're grasping at straws at this point. Hilenius knocked him out worse than Wlad did and Chisora beat the breaks off Hilenius.