voluntarily vs. involuntarily moving up in weight

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Mar 7, 2016.

  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2014
    Messages:
    18,440
    Likes Received:
    9,574
    In terms of legacy, shouldn't fighters who voluntarily move up in weight to take on bigger fighters get more credit than those who eat or naturally grow their way out of their previous weight classes? :think
     
  2. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2015
    Messages:
    4,805
    Likes Received:
    148
  3. WhyYouLittle

    WhyYouLittle Stand Still Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    21
    It always depends on how much the fighter benefitted or was harmed by the process. If a fat f*ck eat his way out of a division harming himself in terms of condition and is still able to establish himself he deserves more credit than a smaller guy that artificially moves up in weight to avoid a tougher competition, for example. Each case is a case.
     
  4. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2015
    Messages:
    4,805
    Likes Received:
    148
    truth
     
  5. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    23,275
    Likes Received:
    26,416
    It shouldn't matter. A fighter's resume is what it is. Whether he grows out of a division or just decides to move up, if he's fighting the top guys in whatever division he's in then he should get credit.