Wait, Froch lost against Direll in 2009???

when did i say stevens was excellent? ....dirrell was excellent and he proved that.....going to frochs hometown and outclassing him....had dirrells career not been derailed by a foul you would have seen it....hes not the same guy anymore...and hes still pretty good....

dirrell has way bigger nuts than lil g...even now

 

I don't agree. Prime Kessler was Ward's best win IMO. Froch being second.
Prime Kessler > Froch > Past prime Kessler of the Froch fight.

 

An ATG based on ... beating Abraham and Groves? Please. Froch can make the HOF with a bit of luck. He's nowhere in any ATG rankings.

 

You didn't say Stevens was excellent, I asked you if you believed he was.

Dirrells best win before Froch was Stevens and you said Dirrell was an excellent fighter and I'm asking what you are basing that on?

If Dirrells best win before Froch was Stevens and in your words he was an "excellent fighter" explain how he was.

And why do you keep mentioning Golovkin? I haven't mentioned him but you can't stop

 

im saying dirrell was an excellent fighter based of what i saw...the eye test....ive said countless times on here that i think ggg is a very good fighter(excellent too)....i can see he has skills...he passes the eye test.......its similar.....

but at least dirrell has a froch and even an abraham on his resume

you love following me around and quoting me

 

So Golovkin is "very good" and "excellent" :good I'm glad you see the talent that he has because the way you constantly go in on him it sounds the complete opposite but I'm glad we cleared that up.

I don't follow you I was responding to your last comment, a comment that you quoted me in, I thought that is how this works, it sort of works like a conversation, maybe I'm wrong :think

 

I'm actually a bigger fan of Froch's, especially after seeing how successful his career became after his matchup with Andre in 2009.

Still, Dirrell beat him handily by at least a few rounds. Also, Froch was very dirty in that fight and should've been deducted at least 1 point.

If anyone thinks that Carl Froch won that matchup, than they don't know how to score a very clear, straight forward fight. I normally don't make generalized statements like that, but if anyone thinks Carl beat him fair and square, than they're just being bias and aren't looking at things from an objective disposition.

It's fair to say Andre won that fight minimum 7-5, probably 8-4. He won so many of the early to mid rounds that's it's impossible to even think Carl fought his way to a draw. Also, if the fight didn't happen in Nottingham, he would've been deducted at least 1 point for his blatantly dirty tactics.

 

Lol at GGG fans mocking Froch and Wards resume. True desperation.

GGGs best win Martin Murray got beat by a past it Arthur Abraham, Froch schooled a better version of Abraham 12-0.

And lets not forget a green Dirrell beat Golovkin in the AMs.

 

and ive constantly said that when I complain about him that ive never questioned that he has skills and ability....never once said he didn't.....there are other things in questions though....like his nuts...and level of competition....and his desire to be great

 

Can you learn to write properly?