Wait, why is GGG still P4P #1 on Ring Magazine?

Ring p4p ratings tend to reward fighters for past dominance. Right now Loma and Crawford are clearly operating on a higher p4p level. I'd argue that even someone like Usyk IMHO. But because Golovkin's been around for longer, and perhaps also because they want to put Canelo #1 there if he manages to beat Golovkin next time, RING has Golovkin as #1. Pac stayed in the top p4p lists far longer than his actual ability too.

The other thing is that there is no clear #1, whoever you choose can be criticized quite effectively:

Loma - clearly the most skilled IMO, but has a loss, missing a signature win over a top p4p opponent.
Crawford - undisputed and unbeaten, but: missing a signature win over a top p4p opponent, always larger than his opponents which some consider should be accounted for in p4p lists.
GGG - not operating on as high a level as the other two, but most thought he beat Canelo ...

 

Lol was he now,I wasn’t on the forum then

 

Isal told everyone it was OBVIOUS photoshopping at the time. Cried like he just found out the easter bunny wasn't real.

 

Srisaket is #1.

Disagree and you are fighting quite an uphill battle in the debate that follows.

So much so that I don't have to rationalize having Srisaket #1. YOU have to rationalize having anyone else #1.