Wake up: V. Klit is a solid top-10 ATG!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MRBILL, May 30, 2010.


  1. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    Holyfield was 37 and 38 in the Lewis fights (Lennox was 33 and 34) and he performed well in the 2nd fight considering his advanced age.
    What if we take the 37 year old Lewis from the Vitali fight and put him in with Holyfield aged 34 from Tyson I...Does the big man still have it so easy?

    :deal
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,020
    48,132
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol: Allow me to explain.


    Medication is obviously better. This is a given. Chagaev is an example of a fighter who is only slightly depleted rather than near-finished thanks to advances in medicine.

    But training methods? More specialised, but I don't accept that they produce better boxers. SOme examples.



    1 - Fighters now spar less.

    And thank goodness. It's been proven to do long-lasting harm. Fighters have absolutley cut down on sparring across the board in favour of pad-work and conditioning. Good for health. Bad for skill. Sparring is indisputably the single best training method for imporving boxers. You will not find a single trainer or wise head to dis-agree with that statement. This, more than anything else is the reason modern training is inferior.

    2 - Feints are out of fashion.

    There are appreciable reasons for this. Feinting is less affective over a 12 round distance than a 15 round distance. But it is a skill, all be it one that is very very hard to teach - and that is more dependant than any other facet of training upon sparring, which happens less.

    3 - Fighters now train for 12 rather than 15 rounds.

    Hatton trained in segments designed to describe 15 rounds "to gain an advantage". Fighters in the 30's an 40's had to train in segments gunned at 18 or 20 rounds to "gain an advantage".

    Hence, my answer, "no", in answer to your question on improved training.


    Training is crucial, but less important than fighting. ACTUALLY EXPERIENCE is more valuable than training. I think you are completely wrong to say "The way you move in the rin, throw a punch, strategy - all from training" is wrong. In fact, I think it's rather naive.


    Hence, my answer, "no".
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,020
    48,132
    Mar 21, 2007
    Lots of Vitali's problems aren't his fault. For example, he has to fight with his brother for the right to dispatch the #3 HW in the world, every time. Secondly, he can never fight the #2/#1 HW in the world because that is his brother. It's unfair. But it is the way it is. The fact is, Vitali has NEVER BEATEN the #2/#1 in the world. When it was Lewis, he lost. When it was his brother, he can't fight him.

    It's not a question of "penalising" him for sharing an era with his brother. It's judging him in terms of beating the best of his era. He lost the #1 heavy he shared an era with and can't fight the #2. He's untested! How many times did he even fight the #3 HW in the world?! The semi-retired Sanders? Was Peter the #3 in he world when he beat him?

    Vitali's resume isn't just bad, it's void of even the best people he shared his time with! He's just beaten a guy who is not a top 20 HW, and according to some online ranking sites, doesn't make the TOP FIFTY. So what if he looked dominant? Who cares?

    Someone asked recently, "what is the difference between Vitali and Marciano, who did he beat?" Well he beat the best of his era, gentlemen. As champion, he only ever matched the #1 or #2 contender in the world. Not only has Vitali not done that, he hasn't done anything LIKE It.

    When people say, "oh you can only snipe based upon his resume", but his resume is nothing less than the worst out of every single fighter even CONSIDERED for a top 20 birth. People want to think about that.
     
  4. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    Hey, I labelled it the "X Factor". I'm just throwing it out there. Some boxers are mentally stronger than others. And some of the smaller ATGs are little midgets standing next to Vitali. He'll let them know it at the press conferences. They haven't fought an athlete anywhere near his size before, ever. You telling me NONE of the 200-215 pound ATGs would ever be AT ALL troubled by thoughts of "Maybe this giant is just too big for me"? That it won't even cross their minds, that they won't even consider it when they're looking at him?

    Like it or not, but after 6 rounds, a lot of ATGs are going to find that they are four or five down on the cards, they are eating a lot of punches, they are finding it tough to land clean and when they do it has little effect. Guys like Foreman and Tyson demonstrated in their careers that these are the circumstances that defeat them. They didn't lose by early KO, or by decision. They lost by being broken down piece by piece and then stopped. That is exactly how Vitali fights.

    Vitali isn't a one shot KO artist, but he is brutally efficient at breaking fighters down. He is patient, his stamina is good and he is very good at fighting on his terms. He isn't going to be stopped early by anyone, pretty much, and he is going to be a nightmare for anyone to outpoint because of his volume punching.

    Well, that's not what I said. I said that the unknown is more intimidating than the known. Not so much Vitali's race, but his completely foreign nature could well be unsettling. And fighting in Germany would by itself be a challenge that most ATGs never had to adapt to at all, let alone against a legitimately dangerous opponent.

    :hat
     
  5. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004

    Where's Rocky Marciano? He belongs in front of Sonny Liston......................
     
  6. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    All else being equal, a bigger man will beat a smaller man. There's a reason why there are weight divisions in boxing. Joe Louis weighed in at less than 200 pounds for the Schmeling rematch. The size difference alone spells big, big trouble for Louis if Vitali can fight and has a chin, which he does.

    :hat
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,020
    48,132
    Mar 21, 2007
    Of course it would. And of course it wouldn't matter on fight night.

    You are talking about the most accomplished men, in the history of the sport at what they do. It will make no more difference than it did to Chagaev before he boxed Wad or Byrd before he boxed Vitali, a factor to be considered in developing strategy and deploying tactics.

    A non-issue.



    That is exactly how he fights #10, #32, #8 contenders in the weakest era in the history of this division. Supplanting it onto h2h match ups with greats is reasonable, but expecting it to go as it does against Johnson or Albert against Tyson or Ali is a huge reach.

    Think about this. You've been determined to point out how much bigger Vitali is than everyone these guys has ever faced. Has it actualy crossed your mind just how much better these ATG's are than everyone Vitali has ever beaten? It's ridiculous. If semi-retired Sanders is REALLY the best guy Vitali has beaten, the gulf is absolutley collosal - perhaps as much as three actual classes. For me, this is far, far more significant.

    .


    Exactly my point. Nobody is going to worry about stepping in and stepping out in one round.

    You can trust me when I say that the men you are discussing know the fights inside out, and the pigmentation and height of the opponent will not cause these guys to ****. Just take it to the bank, you're barking up the wrong tree.
     
  8. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    No, Foreman was not intimidated by Ali. Ali planted the seed of doubt in his head but he did not intimidate him.
    No, Holy didn´t imitate Tyson either, he just didn´t allow Tyson to intimidate him which got to Mike.
     
  9. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    1. Ali
    2. Holmes
    3. Johnson
    4. Louis
    5. Lewis
    6. Foreman
    7. V.K.
    8. Holy
    9. Tyson
    10 Frazier / Marciano (tie)

    MR.BILL:deal
     
  10. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Sonny Liston was a great heavyweight fighter, but also a shitty champion......

    That applies to Riddick Bowe & Timmy Spoon, too.....

    Ike Ibeabuchi? The Prez was / is way over-hyped.........

    MR.BILL:bbb
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    :rofl:rofl:rofl:lol::lol::lol:
     
  12. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    But all else isn't equal, is it? If Vitali and Louis were equal in all departments I may be willing to grant that - depending on style - but the fact is they are nothing alike. They are a clash of styles and therefore you can't say that Vitali's size alone wins the fight for him.
     
  13. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    Tyson never had problems with stamina when he was properly prepared, ever. Tyson showed solid stamina against Tillis, Green and especially in his ferocious onslaught on Ribalta for 10 rounds, and superb stamina across 12 rounds against Smith, Tucker and particularly in his brutal war with Ruddock. Tyson would slaughter Vitali early similar to how Dempsey butchered Willard; big mechanical robots are perfect opponents for Tyson and Dempsey.

    About Foreman, his stamina was held back when he was younger due to dehydration before fights when he was with trainer Dick Sadler (who wasn't fired until after the Ali fight) who wrongly believed it would make George faster and sharper and the extreme heat in Zaire made him tire much quicker, as it would to most fighters. Anyway Foreman demolishes Vitali within 5 rounds, so don't bother mentioning stamina.

    :nut
    :good
     
  14. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    And? How do you think Vitali would have done if he was unfortunate enough to run into a priming Ali? Vitali would have been an even shittier champion on the basis that if he had beaten Patterson twice, it would not have been in as convincing fashion, and he wasn't beating Ali whether he fought him once, twice, '67 or '64/'65.
     
  15. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Joe Louis was a great combination puncher with TNT in both fists but, he was also between 198 to 213 pounds during his 12 year reign at the top...... If pitted against V.K. in a time machine, Louis would look very small and would be facing a man who too can fight / box very well......

    Point is, Louis would find out very quickly that V.K. is leagues ABOVE "Carnera or Bud Baer."

    Or even Abe Simon........

    MR.BILL:deal:hat