I scored it 116-111 for his opponent. You could argue for Walsh to have won 3 rounds max, which is what I gave him. Completely blind, biased scoring by the judges.
I havnt seen it yet as when i got in they were just announcing walsh the winner i was gutted as well as iv been looking fwd to that fight. Il watch it back today and give my opinion although from what ive seen on social media most think walsh lost
I had walsh by a round and I the knockdown so 3 points very close fight. Watch it without the commentators a lot easier to score fights. All the rounds were close both fighters having good spells. Samir held on too much for my liking I scored on aggression Walsh pipped him. Seen Walsh fight a lot better than that. Was Samir st his best
Have to disagree mate, Ryan was being outboxed pretty easily in most rounds. Ryan was getting frustrated and Samir was getting it almost all his own way. Walsh only won 3 rounds imo with 1 being 10-8. You can't score a fight on aggression alone, Ryan whilst coming forward was being picked off with the jab all night and getting caught with combinations as he walked in. There really needs to be a rematch and it it was an off night for Ryan Walsh he will win next time but I think that Samir might get the win if they did fight again and that Ryan's team will not push for the rematch.
That's why boxing is fun sometimes when its close.. I watched it again this morning exact same verdict.. Samir was hitting with single shots a lot. Be interesting to see punch stats I reckon Walsh will have thrown and connected with a lot more. I agree nicer shots were by Samir though
