I think it does...if you are better at judging whether A beats B than the next guy, you are also better at ranking A over B in the rankings...
I think so too. I'd rather have the rankings stickied than the Constitution thread. I have a saved copy of that on my machine. Anytime someone wants to read it, you can search the forum or just ask me for it.
Crazy things happen, though. As long as you're a fan of the sport as a whole (which you are) and knowledgable (which you are), then predictions don't mean very much. I can't speak for anyone else and don't have a vote, but I think you should consider applying.
You are very generous!:good But I would only have the confidence to call Bute over Mundine, say, if I make it into the Top 5 in Amsterdam's prediction league...it's a big responsibility doing these rankings and we only really want the very best taking part...otherwise, the whole thing becomes a waste of time and, on top, we lose all credibility as a boxing analysis community. In the meantime, I will work hard to improve as an analyst!
i'm in lampley. i wont touch the bigger weights though. i'll stick with my forte when it comes to the rankings