Yes, it is good. I was speaking to the guy who runs it a few years back and what we were talking about were submitted cards being done under the scoring system that the fight was scored under; that is, rbr, 5 point must, whatever. Ten points must system is kind of misleading for some of the older contests. But it's a very minor gripe because I just tend to look at it for newer fights.
The problem I see here is ,I used to go to the fights every month,RAH,Wembley,Manor Place etc.Ringside seat for RAH and the Conference Centre,balcony for Manor Place,the Wembley and RAH fights would be televised and I would watch them the next day ,The fights often took an a different slant on the TV screen to what they did live.There is no substitute for watching the fight from ringside imo.What do they call those opinions in the US next mornings quarter backs or something like that ? I think the site could be enjoyable but not give a definitive verdict ,and lets face it many people couldn't score a fight correctly to save their lives ,so I don't give much credence to fans opinions unless I know they have the ability to objectively interpret what they are watching.
Well I posted a link from the Louis vs Walcott 1 fight and the very site you think was good was criticized. Agreed though. Better for newer fiights.
