Ward and Froch big difference!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mr. HU, Nov 23, 2009.


  1. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    What do you mean there wasn't an outcry? People like you and Danny Rand are still wailing about it?!
     
  2. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    How many points did you give Dirrell for falling down on canvas? How many for holding, for running, for complaining?! No points for punching, no, boxing is only about not fighting.
     
  3. lastletter26

    lastletter26 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,856
    1
    Nov 13, 2008
    I give points on clean punches landed. What they were doing besides that doesn't matter. If froch can't effectively cut off the ring then I'm not giving him credit for trying when he gets his head snapped back and doesn't answer. Even when he did cut if off and dirrell was cornered on the ropes froch couldn't hit him. Some real disgusting misses thrown by froch the whole night. I want to see someones head snap back. Froch didn't let me see that from him and dirrell did when he snapped froch's head back with straights and hooks. I have challenged people on here before to show me 5 clean power punches that landed on dirrell's face, by posting time and round it happened in. No takers. You don't have to do that for dirrell because he was the only one landing power punches to the head. It's called clean punching and it is the chief scoring criteria that filters into the others.
     
  4. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Not the clinches. The ducking below the waist which is illegal!

    This rabbit puching bollocks is getting boring!

    From what I saw Direll would have had a chance if he had faught like a man!

    **** dirrel I hope he turns up to fight against AA.

    Happy Crimbo!
     
  5. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  6. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Seeing someones head snap back does not take into account body shots.

    Froch landed mush better to the body!
     
  7. Mr. HU

    Mr. HU KP vs BHop anniversary Full Member

    3,751
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    Even if Froch landed body shots(which I know he didn't) Dirrell landed way more head shots and hurt Froch in the fight!

    Dirrell was cheated plain and simple!!
     
  8. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    maybe you guys should blame the refs than the fighters..if no points are taking away then it didnt happen....
     
  9. lastletter26

    lastletter26 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,856
    1
    Nov 13, 2008
    LOL if that's the best you can do is come up with something untrue then be my guest. Just watch the fight over. I'm glad atleast that you are acknowleging the fact that he didn't land five power punches on dirrells face the whole fight LOL. Atleast you tried. That's more than anyone else did. Dirrell landed more body shots too LOL. Let's just say what you say is true; then how in the world can you say that froch's so called good body shots were more telling than dirrell's head snapping shots. Please with that idiocracy. Just know that no one who feels that froch won that fight has came with anything better then what you have came with.

    THE ONLY WAY YOU FEEL THAT FROCH WON THAT FIGHT IS BECAUSE YOU INCLUDE STYLE OF FIGHTER IN YOUR SCORING CRITERIA, THEN PLACE ITS IMPORTANCE ABOVE CLEAN PUNCHING
     
  10. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    On Point:deal
     
  11. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    I see what your saying Mr.Hu. Holyfield clinched and headbutted Tyson many times intentionally and also headbutted Lewis & Rahman yet he gets a free pass. Merry Christmas