Ward and his tune-ups. What is the point ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by flashy k.o, Oct 28, 2015.


  1. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    my thoughts on your thread is YAWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
     
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Good points.

    Everyone has different criteria. But now I know he's active again, he'd make my list. (if I had one)

    I think these kind of tune ups are necessary to him, both physically and mentally. I don't think it's just down to money.
     
  3. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Calm yourself.

    I'm a fan of GG's.

    Again, everyone's criteria is different.

    I was just pointing out how subjective it is.

    I respect your criteria. I think it's good. I was just pointing out that although Ward hasn't done much lately, he's had better wins than a guy like GG, therefore he'd be on my list if I compiled one.
     
  4. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    I'd like to know your full criteria.

    I've not seen much of Gonzalez, but I'd be interested to know why you have him at number 1.

    Wouldn't you have Wlad at number 1 for his dominance etc?

    I haven't got a list, but if I had, losses wouldn't automatically omit someone. I guess it would depend on the circumstances.
     
  5. flashy k.o

    flashy k.o Supporter of E.E fighters Full Member

    15,275
    75
    Oct 21, 2011
    yep, Ward should start to fight and beat again top ranked 168/175 pounders to be rated as a p4p fighter.:yep
     
  6. flashy k.o

    flashy k.o Supporter of E.E fighters Full Member

    15,275
    75
    Oct 21, 2011
    Very true but haters gonna hate and trolls gonna troll. Even if GGG would fight Ward @ 168 and beat him , GGG's detractors would probably say that Ward wasn't in his prime anymore or something like that.
     
  7. SOUTHERMOST

    SOUTHERMOST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    216
    Oct 24, 2006
    Tune up fights after a long lay off and let his body absorb the extra pounds.
     
  8. Doc Everlast

    Doc Everlast Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,371
    10
    Aug 23, 2013
    They would say he had not made 168 in 3 years and was drained.
     
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    That's cool.

    I just wondered why you specifically had Gonzalez as your number 1.

    Does dominance, accomplishments and resume factor at all?

    Or is it just mainly skills, or a combination of all those factors?
     
  10. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Cool.

    I respect that.

    Thanks for the reply.
     
  11. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011

    It is said that ignorance is bliss and I am 100% sure that you are the most blissful person in the world. The more you talk the dumber everyone else gets. You are a purveyor of stupidity and should be arrested for being a class A moron. That's a felony.:lol:
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,530
    21,913
    Sep 15, 2009
    This is a thread about Ward. What does Golovkin have to do with it?
     
  13. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,527
    40,044
    Jan 22, 2015
    Nah.. Hed get full credit if he beat Ward at 168. From me anyways.:deal
     
  14. QuadrupleG

    QuadrupleG MAZAFAKA Full Member

    4,309
    3
    May 3, 2014
    Ward is a boring dirty fighter and an unpleasant person. Of course they want to talk about Golovkin instead.
     
  15. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Sorry for the late reply.

    It was nice debating with you too.

    There's nothing like an intelligent debate conducted in a respectful manner.

    :good