Good points. Everyone has different criteria. But now I know he's active again, he'd make my list. (if I had one) I think these kind of tune ups are necessary to him, both physically and mentally. I don't think it's just down to money.
Calm yourself. I'm a fan of GG's. Again, everyone's criteria is different. I was just pointing out how subjective it is. I respect your criteria. I think it's good. I was just pointing out that although Ward hasn't done much lately, he's had better wins than a guy like GG, therefore he'd be on my list if I compiled one.
I'd like to know your full criteria. I've not seen much of Gonzalez, but I'd be interested to know why you have him at number 1. Wouldn't you have Wlad at number 1 for his dominance etc? I haven't got a list, but if I had, losses wouldn't automatically omit someone. I guess it would depend on the circumstances.
yep, Ward should start to fight and beat again top ranked 168/175 pounders to be rated as a p4p fighter.:yep
Very true but haters gonna hate and trolls gonna troll. Even if GGG would fight Ward @ 168 and beat him , GGG's detractors would probably say that Ward wasn't in his prime anymore or something like that.
That's cool. I just wondered why you specifically had Gonzalez as your number 1. Does dominance, accomplishments and resume factor at all? Or is it just mainly skills, or a combination of all those factors?
It is said that ignorance is bliss and I am 100% sure that you are the most blissful person in the world. The more you talk the dumber everyone else gets. You are a purveyor of stupidity and should be arrested for being a class A moron. That's a felony.
Ward is a boring dirty fighter and an unpleasant person. Of course they want to talk about Golovkin instead.
Sorry for the late reply. It was nice debating with you too. There's nothing like an intelligent debate conducted in a respectful manner. :good