Ward bitchin about travelling.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Two Shakes, May 25, 2013.


  1. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008

    Ohhh the ****in irony.

    You actually said that Pavlik would beat Ward, and you have the ****in audacity to post about others being delusional.:rofl:rofl
     
  2. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    Let me enlighten you a little.
    Ward is a PROFESSIONAL boxer, the word professional means its his job/profession, its how he pays his bills.
    If he was in the boxing game for the love of it, then stick to winning golds at the Olympics. He's in the boxing business to make money, but because of his style of boxing and his personality (or lack of one) he cannot generate interest/money unless the paying public want to pay to see the fight, and i just don't see what options Ward has at 168 besides Froch in the UK or a joke contest against JCC.
    Nobody except the usual ESB morons are saying Froch is the better fighter, or that he'll beat Ward in a rematch, but facts are facts regarding generating interest and a rematch in the UK would be big on both sides of the Atlantic.
    Ward is just coming over as being real bitter, people keep saying he's classy and humble, but he sounds like a spoilt child who cannot get his own way.
     
  3. Bulletproof

    Bulletproof Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,129
    6
    Mar 6, 2012
    Let me enlighten you a little...

    It's Prize Fighting bro, generating revenue by putting asses in seats goes without saying. Ok, that's out of the way. My point is Ward beats Carl handily, no pun intended. So what does Carl proceed to do except basically name call and act like a bratty little child. This is like two kids fighting in the schoolyard, the winner goes on his merry way and the loser goes around saying how much nicer the house he lives in is and that he has more friends than the other guy. Wonderful, but the only thing is wtf does that have to do with the fact that a beating was administered? NOTHING!!! That is my single point!! What does Carl's drawing power or "fan friendly style" or claims that Ward is "boring" have to do with the fight that the majority of folks on these forums witnessed?

    The fight that fan friendly mega star Carl Froch was dominated in. Froch and his fans can cling to the two scores of 115-112 or whatever they were all they want to feel like it was a close fight. Unfortunately doing so doesn't make it reality. So to feel better about losing to a boring one handed fighter Carl wants to talk about drawing power. That is some certified undeniable ***** ****...
     
  4. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    god, you are so stupid over there.

    read my post slowly so you understand. can you do that?

    i want Ward to fight in the UK because he won't get away with using illegal tactics in the fight. did you understand that?

    the other reason is that he never traveled in the super 6 like everybody else. fighting on the road would be a different experience altogether. i mean, would he be able to handle that? by the looks of things... no. he's breaking down mentally already and making the silliest excuses i have ever heard. he looks stupid.

    so, did you understand that? or are you going to continue talking crap?

    you did call the judges in the UK corrupt. go back and read your posts.
     
  5. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    Ward needs to fight on the road and box clean. that is all any one asks. but no, you keep on crying and making excuses for him. it's sad.
     
  6. Former Dawg

    Former Dawg Active Member Full Member

    631
    0
    Jul 11, 2009
    I honestly believe if it goes to a decision Ward will get jobbed in England. As far as illegal tactics go look at the things Carl Froch got way with in the Dirrell fight. You cannot have it both ways. You cannot expect anyone to believe the English refs do not let illegal things happen if you view the Dirrell Froch footage.
     
  7. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    Hes not the opponet hes the champ that easily beat mr cupcake Froch.

    Ward was just saying he doesnt have to go over there and thats true. but alot of fans (inculding me) feel he should to add that to his resume. nobody really thinks Froch can win so he should take the fight
     
  8. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    That cuts both ways. Froch likes the more than occasional rabbit punch. Watch the Dirrell fight again where Andre complains about Froch's dirty tactics.

    I'll be consistent here. I think not nearly enough points are taken during fights. Boxing is the only sport I know of where you get repeated warnings for fouls. How many fighters use the low blow as a tactic because the know it won't cost them anything?

    Bottom line, Froch is far from being a clean fighter so don't belly ache too much and assume if the rules are applied FAIRLY Froch will gain a benefit.
     
  9. JDezi4

    JDezi4 Guest

    Oh, now I get it... Ward only wins becuz he uses illegal tactics

    Yeah, cause Ricky Hatton, Amir Khan, and even Froch himself are the cleanest fighters becuz the British referees let them get away with no foul play

    If a British ref penalized Ward for any of his "tactics" that would be hometown bias... Ward doesn't do illegal tactics prove to me the headbutts in the Kessler fight were intentional? Show me at what point he uses illegal tactics, and don't give me that "compuclinch" bull**** either... I'm talking about legitimate illegal tactics that deserve penalization

    Ricky Hatton made a career of illegal tactics on the inside

    An Olympic Gold Medalist needs a new experience of fighting on the road... :verysad

    What u actually mean is fighting with a hostile crowd cheering as Froch misses a sloppy combo, hopefully influencing the judges as much as possible

    Find it for me cause I don't see it :roll:
     
  10. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    well it looks like you're willing to talk in a sensible fashion, so i'm cool with that.

    when Dirrell kept on ducking at the waist (which is illegal) Froch fired back with his own dirty tactics. fight fire with fire i say. that's fair wouldn't you say?

    plus the amount of frustration Carl must have felt what with Dirrell failing to do anything but flop all over the floor and run. so i don't blame him. if Dirrell hadn't of done all that ****, and Carl used some of those tactics, i'd definitely speak up about it. but that didn't happen.

    i'm not saying low blows don't happen, but i wouldn't say it's wide spread in boxing. there are some fighters that do in most of their fights, but most don't go there. so i can't say i notice it all the time. but if it does, refs should take points away like the rules state.

    apart from the Dirrell fight, Froch fights clean. there maybe a few times over a handful of fights that he hits behind the head, but it's a fight, everybody has these moments. it's when it happens every fight and is constantly applied that we can call a certain fighter dirty. but not until.

    Froch would most definitely benefit from a clean fight with Ward. it's not going to make it worse that's for sure. :good
     
  11. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    %0
     
  12. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Problem is Ward didn't fight Carl all that dirty. Carl would put himself in position to let Ward tie him up, position him, let go and punch because he couldn't control the distance against Ward and couldn't do anything on the inside against him either. Ward wasn't tying up to stall for the most part, it was positioning and bullying. Someone posted a link to rounds 9/12 so I just watched that part again.

    Ward has a clear speed and skill advantage on Froch and knows how to use it, and unlike Taylor, doesn't gas. Froch has done better than I ever expected he would with his caveman approach and warrior spirit but I don't see anyway that he can use what tools he has to beat Ward. He can't frustrate Ward into falling into HIS game plan. Quite the opposite, it was Froch who was letting frustration get the better of him.
     
  13. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    SOB Ward was the "ONLY" fighter that did not have to travel, all the others did. SOB Ward always gets his way, he has his own personal referee, judges, commentators, venue, ring, gloves, etc.

    SOB WARD BEAT KESSLER WITH HEAD BUTTS. THAT FIGHT WAS STOPPED ON AN INTENTIONAL ILLEGAL HEAD BUTT THAT CAME FROM ACROSS THE RING! SO, INTENTIONAL ILLEGAL HEAD BUTTS ARE LEGAL FOR WARD AND WARD ONLY.
     
  14. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    you took my ****ing post down to JDezi4? what the **** is that 0% all about?
     
  15. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    is someone messing with this site?