Why would I? I've answered a million of your questions, and every time I prove you wrong you just go on to the next question , and ignore any question I have. It's okay man, we know that you made a fool out of yourself getting all upset about a post you misconstrued, but you can get over it. You don't have to obsess over how I educated you, and try to get some W over this by asking me a million more questions.
you already surrendered ages ago, right after you changed the topic after I proved you wrong. It was cute how desperate you were to get some kind of win by asking me a million other questions off-topic.
whatever argument you dragged this out to instead of just realizing you were wrong. can you get over it now, or do you want the last word that desperately? just beg for it and I'll give it to you.
Run out of options? says the guy that keeps asking me to answer his questions when he refuses to answer mine. Just beg and I'll let you have it little boy.
Hey aquamarine remember when I said the reason why Floyd was clearly the biggest draw was due to his trash talking and the urban community getting behind him, and people hating him which resulted in people paying to see him lose? OH remember when I asked who all the other draws that are similar to a technical style are, and you completely ignored it like I predicted? You named one technical boxer that's popular good job! You sure did prove your point. :rofl:rofl
I never edited my original post adding that, stop lying . I did however edit the post after explaining that I clearly stated in my previous that the CASUAL fans prefer kovalev's style of ward's style. I see that you're resorting to lying since you're getting owned, and getting off the topic that Floyd is the only draw. Was the original post, take note of the bold, I never added anything later on. Beating Hopkins wouldn't do anything for Ward. What did it do for Dawson? Ward would get very little credit for beating the senior citizen, the reason why Kovalev has a huge fan base now is due to his style, casual fans far prefer sluggers than technical boxers. This is the post where I edited it to be more clear, so you'd understand. Does the brit**** disagree? Obviously he has skill too, but are you saying his style doesn't represent a slugger at all? hahahahahah, the fact that you find me calling Kovalev a slugger funny is actually funny in itself. Kovalev is more of a boxer puncher, but my point was clearly that there are 2 sides of the spectrum, a slugger and technical boxer, and in between there are different styles, and Kovalev is far closer to the slugger side than the technical one. Casual fans like yourself far rather see sluggers. The fact that you couldn't figure this out shows how dumb you are . edited the bold.
Yes, the reason he's a huge draw is due to his **** talking. But there's other factors which I added in, and I'll add more, like undefeated record. You can trash talk all you want, but if you never back it up you wont be a huge draw, which Floyd does. I asked you for the top draws for technical boxers and yet you still can't answer that simple question. Like I said, you never answer anything you just proved my point here by not answering again. Nope none of them are pure sluggers but I was clearly saying to casuals, they look at 2 styles, sluggers/technical, and when they look at the 4 they see them more as sluggers than technical boxers. You keep ignoring that point which you're well aware that I've stated to try to win this argument, whihc you clearly know I've implied a million times, but you've lost badly. Keep resorting to lies.
Why would I bother answering any of your questions anymore . Do you have autism? Autistic kids feel entitled to having all of their questions answered(it's all about them), but refuse to answer anyone else. My point about bringing up the trash talking, is that there are other factors needed to become popular if you're a technical boxer, trash talking is one, there are many more reasons too. Yes obviously floyd is the biggest draw, but like I said, what other technical boxers are huge draws , until you answer this you lose.
Cringeworthy. Two grown ass men arguing on a boxing Internet forum for five ****ing pages about whether a boxer can be described as a slugger. Jesus in a year's time you guys will look back on this thread and just think wtf am I doing with my life. Imagine if Kovalev and Hopkins were reading this. Jesus ****, people on here are beyond weird.
True, I'm just going to let this autistic virgin get the last word. I don't mind debating, but when someone asks a million questions, but doesn't answer any it's just a waste of time.