Our subject has taken on board the criticism of the :deal emoticon and the quick tell of the :deal emoticon trying to feign the perception of a victory. Thankfully this is not a poker game as our subject would be losing big coin due to the obvious tells he's displaying of weakness an insecurity. However like a bluffer always bluffs, he too is trying to still seek out this non-existent victory. Referring to our poker ****ogy he's trying to play 8-5 off suit against two kings. His bravery must be admired, but it is a foolish mistake and one that will not work against a skilled person who can read his tells easily.
The subject is now displaying the symptoms of a child who does not have the mental capacity to process information, specifically the information in the previous post. This will begin to register with the child when they begin to engage in social activities, where language is a key instrument in the development of the social being. However we are dealing with a grown adult, so perhaps a running record of the child's behavior in a fixed play scenario would be a recommended first step for future intervention.
atsch :rofl Go and console each other daddy isn't interested in hearing your sobbing anymore. Game over. I win again.
Just like the child who has not received much or any positive reinforcement from their parents or peers, they are cranky and do not know how to process this information logically. The ability to process information logically will occur at a later age, almost before the reach the teen years. However our subject is a grown man, so this too will benefit our application for some explicit instruction in social skills for the classroom and maybe in terms of acquiring an SNA for our subject. The ego has been hurt, and as mentioned previously, the egocentrism of a child in the pre-operational child is strong. This is all very hard for the child to process but acceptance is key. Tantrums are an expected side effect of this.
No he didn't you idiot. He fought Dirrell twice. Beat him once and lost the other. Ward hasn't lost a fight since he was 12.
Source/proof so genius. Ward hasn't lost a fight since before his teens. He didn't even fight non Americans then as he was a ****ing kid you idiot
Oh I dunno hmmmmm...maybe before he turned 12 he lost maybe? You know Ward was boxing before that age so maybe it was then perhaps maybe perhaps It's well known that Ward hasnt lost since he was a child. But quit ducking, wheres the factual proof of Ward even fighting Golovkin, let alone losing to him?
May I ask: how did he not lose if he took only the second place in the 1st AIBA American 2004 Olympic Qualifying Tournament ?