Wardley activates rematch clause with Dubois

Regardless I expanded on my meaning in my following post

Didn't stop you from ignoring that and being a smart arse

 

Should Itauma defeat Hrgovic it will give him time for another fight after to prepare for the winner.

 

Not really, you proceeded to describe "gung ho" as "not standing in front of an opponent" which when using the original context of your post made even less sense.

Also didn't stop you from trying to be a smart ass when I used a win over Parker as an example of overhyping an opponent, similar to what is happening now with Dubios.

Dubios is a dirty fighter and in my view, is heavily overrated. The way people are acting on here you'd think he just beat Usyk.

 

Yeah well, why not when that's how you want to post
Might as well answer in a similar manner

Again I explained my use of the term so even if it's used incorrectly, surely that made my point
But nope, like many on here say you just like an argument for the sake of it

 

Wouldn't need to argue if you just manned up and admitted you were wrong, similar to how I did with you when I misused a word in another thread and you called me out on it.

 

Hold on, by re explaining my meaning I'm kinda admitting I got it wrong (in Oxford dictionary terms)

 

It's a bit of a stretch lol, but we've wasted enough time on that imo. Safe to say wires were crossed and we can move on.

Back on topic, I'm not entirely sure why people are giving Wardley zero chance in a rematch. This could very much play out like Wardley v Clarke.

 

Yeah all he has to do is come off his jab from the get go this time and move laterally away from that quick overhand then setup his hook late fight and he'll have Wardley on the canvas...Wardley will do what Dubious did in the Usyk rematch, shrink hoping for a one punch chance conserving energy only to get ripped apart by being too conservative.