Warren: "You cannot put muscles on Haye's chin"; "Haye, vacate so Macca can unify!"

not sure where to start with that load of biased bollocks.
On a couple of issues it comes down to Warren's work against Haye's work.....hmmmm.....now who has previous for talking shite? And does Haye seem like a guy who ducks tough fights?

you can't put muscles on ANY chin....Maca has been knocked out by low level Swaby and in serious trouble against Bruce Scott.
Warren should shut the **** up about this subject until his man Maca fights someone half decent and in their prime.

 

What a load of bollox!

 

Maca v Haye at heavy would be like Hatton fighting Calzaghe?


utter wanker

 

"So do British boxing a favour — vacate the titles so Enzo Maccarinelli can try and do what you couldn’t: Unify the belts."

Wow after wasting 5 minutes of my life reading that trash i stumbled on these immortal comments in the last paragraph.Right lets to the maths people.Haye won the WBA and WBC belts.That IS a unification.He is also the true linear champ after beating Mormeck.Thus his tenure as undipusted champ at 200lbs is unquestionable.But Warren in all his wisdom has the audacity to claim that Haye hasnt unified and his boy Enzo who only became champ after Nelson retired through injury, and solidified this with wins over Hobson and Bobby Gunn is the new man on the block to take seriously?! Is this guy having a laugh?

 

Yeah a 5ft 6 guy at 140 against Joe 5ft 11 at 168.Big comparison there isnt it.I mean Haye at 6ft 3 210lbs vs Enzo 6ft 4 at 200 or 210lbs.Yeah thats really like Ricky fighting Calzaghe.What a ****ing moron.This guy never stops.

 

does he not realise how ****ing stupid he sounds?

 

Evidently not.Hence why he wasted a few hours of his life writing that rubbish.Thats why his the biggest promoter in Europe!

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl Fwank you tit.

 

I agree, but his sinister nature comes across blatendly. The man is such a ****.

 

LOL I read this article this morning too! atsch

I hope Warren said it tongue in cheek!

The other writer knows nothing about boxing either. He said Mayweather was defending his WBC and WBA titles against Hatton! :huh

The worse thing I reckon was about The Lockett (Gary Lockett) being the WBO number 1 contender for Kelly Pavlik, that says it all really.
Lockett has done nothing to merit a top 10 place let alone a number 1 challenger position. Another vacant WBO title fight anyone??:-((

We have heard this all before. When Young Mutley beat Michael Jennings who was number one at the time, Mutley went number 10! Soon after Jennings was back up there, now at number 2! :yikes

When I look at the WBO rankings, I think they are heavily biased.

 

He cannot be serious, can he? FW I mean.

 

as decebal said, sounds good to the layman but that is all.

when marco huck beats steve cunningham , no way warren tries to unify with him.

let haye say a word about warren in return and warren will have all his lawyers out sueing for libel.

 

Yep, its in the Sun not Boxing Monthy, most of the readers will believe every word. The average sports fan doesn't know **** about boxing really, I was in a pub last Tuesday and overheard some guys talking about JC-Kessler.....at first they didn't know Kessler had a world title, then 'remembered' he'd been a champion at 3 weights....:nut