Warrior or just really protected well????????

I am not going to argue your bias. That is pointless.
Go ahead and hate, probably makes you feel like you know more about boxing.

 

it will prove (if it's public) that those who think pac is really protected are only joyboys and the regular haters with all the fair and neutral posters voting against. :good

 

The questions from the thread starter are legit.

Problem is, every time someone even thinks about questioning anything about Pac, they get attacked by mobs of Pac fans and are immediately labeled as "*****s" and "haters"!


Only a few of them will actually try to answer doubts about Pac without attacking.

 

See how that works?

 

See what I mean...

I have a different opinion. I personally don't give Pac the credit a lot of you do for his recent victories. And I am just reduced to the status of a hater.

If you were a Cotto fan, you might have reason to talk.

 

you only agreed on that part because you are a clottey fan and did not agree with the rest because it probabaly didn't concern you.

 

Oh I agree...


The only difference is, if you read the threads, there are far more senseless, baseless, attack threads about Floyd.

 

:yep

 

I am a cotto fan.
He is my favorite boxer, actually.
I lost money on his last fight.

 

lol. i am one of the few who had actually wasted time with the TS's ****.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

Damn... Am I that transparent!?!?

 

No one argues floyd's skills. We just don't like the guys he picks to use them against.

 

**** Cotto. The only time in my life I ever betted with him, and I lose a ton of chips! WTF!

 

I'm neutral on Pacquiao. For years I've actually been a fan. I've been watching him ever since HBO has been showing him, and that's a long time now. My comments are completely objective. Not hating at all.

 

so you think that his point of pacquiao not wanting to fight morales a 2nd time until he losses is legit? i am surprised that you people think that the TS's argument are all valid. yes he pointed out to all the holes and nitpick all the things that could make it bad regarding pac's opposition but it is not the whole story and circumstances around the fight when the fight was made. and fighter's resume could be blemished if he will lay it out the way he did it. and not all his points are accurate nor true.