Warrior or just really protected well????????

Also, consider Pac leapt 17 lbs in 2 fights! That is a 13% weight gain in a very short time. THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO HMMMMMMMMMMM????????????:think

 

Imressive, isn't it?

 

Anyone can jump 25 pounds and fight the skeleton of Oscar De La Hoya..

 

to play the TS game, did bhop fought pavlik in his weight? is fighting roy jones next being a warrior or ***** move? see, it's quite easy even with bhop. the thing is you can pick holes in anyones resume, but it doesn't mean a fighter is protected. so who aside from bhop do you think has more of a better resume than pacuiao that is currently active?

 

Tru although most of esb picked DLH (not me).
Regardless Pac's one of the best around. U can't deny that.

 

B-Hop fought smaller men. Pac fights bigger men.

 

I would say he is a warrior, but if we are going to hold up one's man record to a set of standards, then we should hold up the other man's as well. People like to say Floyd ducks and runs, well look at his record and look at Manny's record and see for yourself minus the tinted glasses one way or the other. The people that say Mayweather ran from Mosley(which isn't true) are eerily silent when confronted that Pacquiao demanded Shane fight him at 143 lbs or walk, They say Floyd beats up on smaller fighters when he fought Ricky Hatton(even though Hatton is a former Belt holder) and Juan Manuel Marquez, even though Pacquiao did that against Oscar Larios. All I am saying what is good for the goose is good for the gander and if Mayweather is a ducker then so is Pacquiao.

 

I'm not Pac biggest fan but his resume is just great. You look at only one side of the facts because you are either a hater or you need attention. With your way of thinking you can disrespect any ATG resume.

 

Floyd isn't the ducker he is made out to be. He is just an idiot for claiming to be the greatest boxer ever. That is why people rip on him, because he thinks he is the best to ever do it.
Stupid comments like that ask for verbal abuse.

 

I never, ever, ever, ever, denied he was one of the best around. I never said he didn't deserve props. He is an exciting tough fighter, who will chop the **** outta ya. But he is not all-time #5, or the best of our generation, and **** like that. I get sick of hearing that bull**** because it sinply isn't true.

 

:good

 

i have no problem with floyd's resume. even oscar and hatton is a very good win for him. the only thing i can criticize floyd is to fight just one elite welter which he has not done yet. you could say judah but he was never elite at the weight. maybe add to that trying to fight jmm at welter but that's it.

 

I would say 2000-2010 that Pacquiao is top 2 with mayweather, depending on your preference of styles.
10-15 All time great by the time his career is over for sure.

 

Read and weep motha****a.....

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P1-105128070.html

 

Pac's last three fights:


PAC vs DLH
- BEFORE: Pac was the heavy underdog. Everybody was saying Pac can't beat DLH
- AFTER: Now, everybody is saying DLH is dehyrdated.

PAC vs Hatton
- BEFORE: Hatton is bigger, more aggressive, and the man to beat at 140.
- AFTER: Hatton is overrated.

PAC vs Cotto
- BEFORE: Cotto's gonna kill Pac, size difference to great.
- AFTER: Cotto's not been himself since Margarito fight.


Now what? :hi::hi: