Was a little skeptical of dawson at first, but....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by christo, Oct 30, 2008.


  1. christo

    christo Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,034
    107
    Sep 13, 2008
    I didn't forget about nard, but do you really think hops would fight chad?
    I don't!
     
  2. Mike_S

    Mike_S Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    171
    Nov 4, 2007
    Never seen him back down, do you think he's scared?
     
  3. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    I know Calzaghe is all set.

    Bernard MIGHT fight him if Jones won't give Bernard the rematch he always wanted.

    I guess the best options are:

    Kessler or a gay ass Tarver rematch.

    If I am advising Chad, I'd would say to let the Calzaghe - Jones dust settle and go from there.

    I am afraid that another Tarver beat down will be coming.

    Or maaaybe he can jump in the water and finally shut down that shark that everyone is so giddy about.
     
  4. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    One more thing. If Jones wins or loses close and he doesn't want to give Hopkins a rematch, I could see him fighting Chad.

    I think Roy is 50/50 on fighting Chad or B-Hop.
     
  5. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    Hard Nard is scared of NO ONE!

    He would gladly take on Chad if the money is right.

    He loves fighting those undefeated studs.
     
  6. Mike_S

    Mike_S Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    171
    Nov 4, 2007
    yep, maybe not enough money in it though but sure HBO could hype him up some what.
     
  7. christo

    christo Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,034
    107
    Sep 13, 2008
    No, but i don't think he will fight chad. he's hanging out for the winner of joe/roy instead.
     
  8. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Dawson is the real deal and here to stay
     
  9. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    he lookedgreat against Tarver but, Tarver had clearly shot his final load against Woods.

    i havnt forgot his lazy performance against overrated Glen Johnson, I cant see him being top 10 p4p.
     
  10. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    Cosign. He has been tested and passed. That punch Glen landed on him in the 7th I think was a monster. He took it and kept fighting and fighting well. I thought Tarver could take him out due to styles but he passed that test as well. And that was not a shot Tarver. That was a Tarver coming off a great performance against Woods that of course everybody forgot and Tarver was in great shape though he faded. He faded b/c he threw more punches then he hardly ever does and had to do to keep pace and score. I never seen Tarver miss so many shots except for against Bhop.
     
  11. imp4pdabest

    imp4pdabest Guest

    Disagree with the Tarver statement. Tarver was shot, his performance against Woods was horrible, Woods just made him look that good, Glen Johnson was a very tough opponent. Dawson has lots of skill for a guy his size, he's gonna be the number 1 guy in his division until he retires.
     
  12. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    You gotta be kidding us?

    Pavlik and Cotto were both p4p.

    Both loose.

    Pavlik to the master over 12 rounds.
    Cotto gets knocked out cold by limited plotter in Margo.

    Who should stay in p4p - the one that was still standing eventhough he met the legend or the one who got KTFO by a limited guy?

    __________________

    This is always the same. Latinos manage to sneak in these guys into the p4p all the time and people let it slide because they dont care about those divisions. Pavlik has more reason to be in p4p than Cotto has. That is for sure. And Mijares - talk about being exposed. He is a dumber fighter than Judah.
     
  13. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    So you're still posting about your "opinion" of Mijares?

    Either you start talking about something else, or you'll get exposed worse than Mijares.