Was Bayless a factor?

No Bayless was fine. Floyd was holding way too much and Bayless did have a couple of quiet words and the clinching stopped. Ofcourse thats happens to be when the running started.

 

He was a factor because he got to referee the next Mayweather match after being criticized by many to have protected Mayweather against Maidana.

 

Floyd won but this wasn't a defining fight because it wasn't a dominant win. Floyd did what De La Hoya did against Trinidad. The only difference is Floyd won.

 

No.

 

As I now understand it though Floyd cannot use xylocaine for a week before a fight so he didn't use xylocaine.

 

Look, man. You said if Floyd won a fair fight you would be the first to give him credit. Now be a man of your word. There were not an excessive number of clinches. The judges didn't rob Pac. There was no cheapshot that changed the fight. Just man up.

 

He hid the one line of acknowledgement for Floyd's win in a paragraph of justifying why it was not a 'fair' fight.

 

yeah people complaining are ones who dot watch boxing often, mayweather held no where near what other boxers do, and i think youre talking about in between rounds where he got warned for using the elbow

 

No

 

He was great, hardly even knew he was there

 

And you believe that??? ROFLMAO surely you are joking. No one is that naïve. What use would it be to use it a week before the fight ROFLMAO Xylocaine doesn't numb you for over 7 days Jeezatsch

 

Conspiracy theorist AND not a man of his word. Enough said.

 

Ducky & Alex will you guys PLEASE answer my question???
Why did even Floyds hometown fans Boo & Jeer him if they thought he'd won the fight fairly??? C'mon don't hide Answer the question