Was Dirrell faking it???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lewishamboy, Mar 27, 2010.


  1. lewishamboy

    lewishamboy Styles Impetuous Full Member

    9,101
    0
    Jul 15, 2007
    I agree, but sadly you are equating a discussion with an accusation. I never flat out accused Dirrell or Pacquiao or anyone, and starting a thread on the issue is certainly not tantamount to doing so...However, like i said, i don't rule out that Dirrell was playing up. In fact when i first saw it my gut reaction was "FAKE"

    What's meaningless for you isn't meaningless for someone else. I took a lot of understanding from this thread, reading different opinions on what happened, and if anything I am more in favour of Dirrell as a result of it.

    A meaningless debate is a paradox in itself.

    So, again, you are wrong....so get off my nuts
     
  2. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    Moving the goal posts.
     
  3. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    The best I've seen was that he was trying to regain control of that leg to turn over. You've decided you believe Dirrell was a coward looking for a way out. Your opinion. Fine.
     
  4. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    147
    Mar 7, 2010
    not really moving the goal posts. Remember, whether Dirrell was writhing ina semi-conscious state or having unconscious convulsions has nothing to do with MY argument. That distinction only matters to you. I never made any claim about wehtehr he was "tremblng", "twitching", "convulsing" or "writhing" -- my only claim is that he wasn't "acting".

    After looking at the clip I see no evidence that he was "convulsing" -- although the camera angle isn't so good. I do see evidence that he was turning his legs back and forth.

    I know, I said I was out. B-Hop told his mother that he was going to retire from boxing and look at him -- still fighting at 45. I'm no worse than him.
     
  5. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    Another appeal to emotion. I never called Dirrell a coward, but that is much easier to demonize than the fact that we haven't found anything remotely similar to what happened with Dirrell, in the history of convulsed fighters.
     
  6. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    :huh
    anybody else want to jump on this train? I still like the one where you said that Dirrell couldn't have been faking because the doctor's responded to him as if he was not faking it. That **** cracks me up.

    I can just see the doctors coming into the ring after Cole starts screaming "Doctors! Doctors!"

    "Yeah? What? **** you Cole! Tell him to cut the crap!"

    Since they didn't do that though, we know Dirrell wasn't overselling the punch.

    Cobbler's reasoning. :nut
     
  7. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    147
    Mar 7, 2010
    now you're just lying. I never said that. I dare you to find the quote of my saying that.

    You appear to have confused me with "cobbler" which doesn't say much for your reading comprehension.
     
  8. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    147
    Mar 7, 2010
    And, just for fun. Dan Rafae's opinion.
    Ray (Dearborn, MI)



    It's pretty appalling all the "acting" accusations people are aiming at Dirrell. Any buzz of that on your end? What are your thoughts?
    Dan Rafael (12:12 PM)




    I think those who think he was acting should be required to fight 10-plus hard rounds, go to a knee because you've slipped and then have to take a flush right from Abraham that you didn't see and then let me know if it was no big deal. The folks who think he was acting are morons.
     
  9. WesT

    WesT Boxing Addict banned

    5,772
    0
    May 13, 2009
    Dirrell was faking it for sure .... i just don't know what part and how much was for real and how much was fake from the whole thing. But something was fake there . The breathing problems at the end of the fight are 100% fake and who knows what else(maybe the memory loss to) . I got bored of debating this . It's he's fault cuz he's acting like a baby( i hate that crying baby face - how many fighters do that ffs) and that made so many ppl think that the whole thing is an act. The only 1 who knows for sure is Dirrell i don't think even Abraham can tell . NO FURTHER COMMENTS.
     
  10. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    my apologies that was lampley
    conrad + dobler = cobbler for me
    but I guess that is confusing since there already is a cobbler, so I will refrain from that
    lying? no, it was a mistake.
    you are the one who wrote that the movement of Dirrells brain allowed him to keep moving and once his brain stopped moving that he too then stopped moving.


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by conraddobler
    This content is protected

    Allow me to quote:

    "When the brain slams into the inside of the skull, it suffers trauma. It then bounces off the inside of the skull and slams into the opposite side. This causes even more trauma. Depending on the force of the punch, this can happen several times before the brain comes to rest inside the skull."

    The brain is bouncing all over the place, hitting the skull. This is happening slowly. That's why Dirrell didn't immediately go unconscious -- because his brain was still bouncing all over the place.


    so you are saying the bouncing of Dirrell's brain allowed him to continue being conscious, that Dirrell can continue physical movement because his brain is physically moving around in his skull and once the brain settles, Dirrell too settles and goes unconscious.

    so the more Dirrell's brain moves around before settling the more Dirrell is able to move around.

    I don't see where it says anything like that in what you quoted. where does it say the brain coming to rest inside the skull is the point at which consciousness is lost?

    Do boxer's brains bouncing around inside skulls and having convulsions give clean MRI's?