Absolutely, he held physical advantages over the majority of his opponents, and that's why you saw him just run through the majority of them, but he became more technically sound later on. He delivered his punches with better technique, and instead of simply flurrying, he would throw more combination's, which is to say his shots were placed with more purpose.
The world does not revolve around Manny Pacquiao. This is about Erik Morales, so stay on topic, please. :good
Yeah, just stay on topic. Thanks. :good I agree. I don't think it was any one particular weight where he can be distinguished as being at his best, he just got better with more fights and more experience.
Your last point is very interesting Addie, about Morales not having the technical capacity to deal with a Pacquiao, which is possibly true, but if you remember back then Morales was really really good just because of his will to win, which sounds silly to attribute his ability to, but it's the only thing i can stick it to ultimately. A fight with Pac at 122, whichever way it goes would be immense, I do think that Morales was better technically at 122 than Pac was, both were forces of nature more so than anything else really though.
I agree. Morales would have probably defeated the 122lbs version of Manny Pacquiao, but I don't think Morales from 1997-2000 would have beat the 130lbs version. Like you say, that Morales excelled at imposing his will on his opponent, but that'd have gotten him knocked out against a Super Featherweight Manny Pacquiao, in my opinion. He would need to be smart enough to use the jab, step back and counter.
I don't think there was much of a difference between his peak performances at any of the 3 weights. 122 just happens to be where he accomplished the most, and therefore it is regarded by most as his best.