Was Erik Morales washed up in this fight? (VOTE)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MIP4P1, Sep 20, 2009.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 3 of 8
  1. safc1990

    safc1990 Goodbye Bolo :( Full Member

    4,999
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    Sorry I meant that was the closest a shot Morales was capable of coming to producing a great performance vs Pac, his last overall great performance was definitely the 1st fight, Erik just had Pacquiao's number.
     
    safc1990, Sep 20, 2009
    safc1990, Sep 20, 2009
    #31
  2. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    :good

    Even a SHOT and weight-drained Morales can't be counted out when his opponent is the Pacman!
     
    MIP4P1, Sep 20, 2009
    MIP4P1, Sep 20, 2009
    #32
  3. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009
    I don't know how Morales lost to Raheem, because Morales is a much better boxer than Raheem. There should of been a rematch.
     
    Ripple633, Sep 20, 2009
    Ripple633, Sep 20, 2009
    #33
  4. ej1002

    ej1002 Member Full Member

    254
    0
    Sep 19, 2009
    MODS please ban this dumbass...
     
    ej1002, Sep 20, 2009
    ej1002, Sep 20, 2009
    #34
  5. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,904
    6,255
    May 18, 2006
    Morales shot at 28
     
    PIPO23, Sep 20, 2009
    PIPO23, Sep 20, 2009
    #35
  6. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    This man nailed it folks. Don't forget that Raheem boxed BEAUTIFULLY in that fight, and it is the masterpiece of his career.
     
    David Fanning, Sep 20, 2009
    David Fanning, Sep 20, 2009
    #36
  7. pare

    pare Active Member Full Member

    626
    2
    Oct 20, 2008
    pavlik's been down and out lately. he should challenge pac and destroy the little midget, and pav will be p4p #1. :good:good:good
     
    pare, Sep 20, 2009
    pare, Sep 20, 2009
    #37
  8. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    Roach can spot subtle things much quicker than most other trainers and fighters, and much quicker than pretty much any boxing fan.
     
    David Fanning, Sep 20, 2009
    David Fanning, Sep 20, 2009
    #38
  9. mangler

    mangler Active Member Full Member

    742
    2
    Aug 19, 2008
    No. Past prime 4 sho, but not washed up. Raheem was simply all wrong for him.
     
    mangler, Sep 20, 2009
    mangler, Sep 20, 2009
    #39
  10. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    According to Freddie Roach! :good
     
    MIP4P1, Sep 20, 2009
    MIP4P1, Sep 20, 2009
    #40
  11. In_FlaMeS

    In_FlaMeS K-BKois Full Member

    954
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    He was SHOT
     
    In_FlaMeS, Sep 20, 2009
    In_FlaMeS, Sep 20, 2009
    #41
  12. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    I was ringside for that fight, and I guarantee you he was washed up. Raheem was teeing off with shots that *I* could have avoided.
     
    bernie4366, Sep 20, 2009
    bernie4366, Sep 20, 2009
    #42
  13. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    I believe Morales was less effective at 135, he still would've been dangerous if it were possible to continue making 130.
    Morales was still dangerous even against David Diaz at 135, but it just was not a good weight for him. Then we saw what Pac did to Diaz.
     
    H ., Sep 20, 2009
    H ., Sep 20, 2009
    #43
  14. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    Interesting!

    Thanks man, I think it's safe to say Morales was shot!

    Must have been rather disappointing as a fan, ring-side, to see El Terrible in that condition getting his face lit up.
     
    MIP4P1, Sep 20, 2009
    MIP4P1, Sep 20, 2009
    #44
  15. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    I agree now, as well! :good
     
    MIP4P1, Sep 20, 2009
    MIP4P1, Sep 20, 2009
    #45
Page 3 of 8
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.