Was Jim Jeffries Undefeated When He Made His Comeback?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Aug 3, 2015.


  1. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,225
    1,636
    Sep 13, 2006
    The referee was not empowered to render an official decision in the Munroe exhibition, because it was just an exhibition/no decision bout. The "decision" simply was that Munroe was entitled to the monetary bonus offered if he lasted 4 rounds, which he did.
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Correct. McVey never learns....
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    That's a decision by definition.
     
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Originally Posted by apollack

    The referee was not empowered to render an official decision in the Munroe exhibition, because it was just an exhibition/no decision bout. The "decision" simply was that Munroe was entitled to the monetary bonus offered if he lasted 4 rounds, which he did.

    So by that logic, did GunBoat Smith TKO Jack Johnson when his manager stepped in and halted the action in a 4 round ex match?:D

    Do tell Mr. Double standard.

    If there was a " news decision " Jeffries floored Munroe several times, and won it. As Adam stated the ref was not empowered to make a decision.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    Was Jeffries empowered to declare Hart the heavyweight champion when he beat Root? The referee of the Jeffries v Munroe match Duncan Mckenzie said this :


    " Non can ever claim a dishonest decision was rendered when I had the say,and this decision given to Munroe stands absolutely.Munroe deserved it and if the champion did not want to put him out,as he claims, his actions belied him.Jeff meant business as every onewho witnessed the bout knows.Jeff was out of form all right but that does alter the decision or the result.
    The big champion was outdone that night.

    Mckenzie also claimed that Jeffries and Fitzsimmons visited him at his hotel after the fight and attempted to get him to alter his decision but he refused. Mckenzie did not claim that Jeffries was knocked down by Munroe so I think we can take it as gospel that it did not happen.

    ps The Butte Miner stated that Munroe scaled 190lbs for the fight:think
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    You just never learn McVey.

    1 ) The ref was not allowed to call a decision.

    2 ) How could Jeffries lose an ex match when he floored Munore multiple times in rounds 3 and 4? By any scoring this is an easy call.

    What matters is the real fight. Munore was 215 pounds for that one. The fight would have been halted in round one under modern rules.

    Film collectors should take note. This was filmed and Jack Dempsey himself said he saw. I forget when, but it was much later in his life. 1970's I think.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    No decision was rendered during or after the Johnson /Smith sparring session . Munore?
     
  8. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,225
    1,636
    Sep 13, 2006
    It was a decision of sorts, but not a points decision, and not a decision on the merits. It was not a victory or win as we consider it today. It was a decision that Munroe lasted the distance and therefore was entitled to the bonus. The same thing happened in Sullivan - Tug Wilson. Wilson went down 30-50 times in 4 rounds, but he earned the monetary bonus by lasting 4 rounds. But that does not mean he defeated Sullivan or won on the merits. So I think perhaps we are parsing words here. Ultimately, we should say what really happened. Jeffries still was undefeated because he did not lose an official points verdict to Munroe. He wasn't beaten. It merely was an exhibition bout in which he said he would give Munroe a monetary bonus if he lasted 4 rounds. That is all. The bout was what it was.
     
  9. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,968
    2,411
    Jul 11, 2005
    Using the same logic, Joe Gans lost to Harry Berger and Kid Thomas on July 15, 1901, because he failed to stop them in 6 rounds each.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    It was a decision.Jeffries acknowledged it when he said it was the first decision to go against him and, if Mckenzie was telling the truth 'when he later tried to persuade him to reverse the decision.
    Fitz told Jeffries to take him out quick but
    Jeffries, either from complacency or a misplaced sense of duty to the public, or maybe a combination of both, did not initially press the issue ,whether he genuinely tried to stop Munroe and found himself so out of shape that in the rarified air he struggled
    with a man whose only concern was to last the distance and to accomplish it by falling to the ground to escape punishment if necessary.Or, Jeffries decided to let Munroe last to give the public their moneys worth, we will probably never know.

    I think Munroe was very poor when he later fought Johnson reports said he didn't even know how to punch correctly. Jeffries immediately offered him what, $1000 to go against him again but Munroe smelled money, and hype and bullsh*t got it for him.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,724
    29,074
    Jun 2, 2006
    This was merely an exercise in demontstrating how an agenda can spin an occurrence and twist it out of all reasonable recognition and factuality .