Someone on this forum thinks so, and thinks I'm the ignorant nuthugger of modern day fighters because I don't agree. I think he's quite possibly demented honestly. What do you think?
Jones is faster. From conception to detonation Louis is faster p4p at punching, possibly faster actually.
Are you saying Louis is faster at reacting to a punching opportunity because he is certainly not. Reactions, speed and getting his shots off first is 1 thing you cant take away from RJJ
No, i'm not. I'm saying that from conception to detonation Louis is faster p4p, and may have been faster actually.
So you're saying he had faster hands in other words. His punches traveled faster is what you're saying?
Conception = thought of the punch Detonation = threw the punch or landed the punch? So the time between when he thought of the punch until it was thrown or started to be thrown? Either way RJJ is allot faster
Well, we disagree. Cerainly in a p4p sense Louis is faster than Jones @ 168 in terms of handspeed + distance of a serious punch. Tha seems obvious. Overall? Close.
It's closer than it appears so. I mean, we're talking about handspeed, right? Jones is in another world when it comes to footspeed and general body movement, but in pure handspeed, they're very close, especially in a pound for pound sense. If Louis had Ali's footspeed, then you'd have Jones.
What do you mean by distance of a serious punch? You seem to be basing it on the fact that Louis threw shorter, more compact punches, therefore it's close as to the destination time between the two, because Jones a lot of time threw punches from the outside. I'm not talking about that, I'm talking pure speed, pure hand and body speed. Jones would be out of punching range and jump in so quick with a straight shot from a distance that nobody would see it coming. That's speed. Louis had speed of hand, but your argument is based on how quickly the punch gets to the destination, and your argument for Louis is based on the fact that he threw shorter punches, which would obviously get there quicker(though still, a blink of an eye is a blink of an eye, so he's not really even faster in that sense, and then there's the fact that Jones could throw 5 short punches in a row in the span of about a second). I'm talking pure speed though, quickness, that is what this thread is about.
Jones is faster. In purely funcional terms, Louis is the faster puncher. I understand what it is you are saying, but don't be to dismissive of this fact/presented fact.
I now understand your argument on this, but either way, Louis's punches, even though shorter, were easily avoidable by many fighters. Jones's longer distance punches were less avoidable, so even though I understand where you're coming from and it seems reasonable, it's still not neccessarily true. Louis was much more avoidable than Jones, so I don't believe he was a faster puncher in functional terms either, not by a good ways.