Was Kell Brook 100% vs E.Spence??

You break one orbital it's way easier to break the other. If only he could've had more time to recover he might have had a hope but realistically not so much.

 

100% or not, he wouldn’t have won that fight regardless. Stylistically, Spence is too much for him.

 

50% and you're being generous.

 

Yes, 100% of what he was then, so yes.

If you're asking was Brook the best he has ever been, probably not, Golovkin broke him.


But Brook wouldn't and couldn't have been any better against Spence Jr.

 

A bunch of limeys in denial, par for the course.

 

Brook was fine. It wasn't even the same orbital bone that Golovkin smashed! And he always cuts tons of weight.

Spence came to that little island and took his belt back home. Man to man.

end thread/

 

I,d say no. He was already struggling at the weight before the golovkin fight. Shot up in weight...then had to get back down again after a bad injury, weight draining and taking a bit of a beating from golovkin. Not taking anything away from spence but one guy made the correct career moves early enough in his career and the other didnt. By the time brook got there he was the wrong age still trying to fight at the same weight he started at. Spence probably will go through the same battle soon enough...hes done what brook and most guys should do...take the best fights early enough before the weight drain affects your level of performance.

 

Nah. But he was still a good operator. Woukd have beaten most Welterweights.

 

GGG most likely messed up both eyes,Kell didn't have eye problems tell after the GGG fight.It was like Kell was in a car wreck in the bout before.

 

This.