Was Liston-Clay a fix? I don't think so

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by jaffay, Nov 16, 2010.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,843
    12,536
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah, this does cast a bit of suspicion. That it does. It's not evidence, though.
     
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,843
    12,536
    Jan 4, 2008
    Not like me to miss something like that.

    You were talking about the first fight?

    That the odds against Clay in that fight were huge is hardly suprising, though.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,014
    45,996
    Mar 21, 2007
    Of course it's not surprising - but it is tempting for an organised crime family to do crime. More circumstantial evidence, is all i'm pointing out.

    Never enough to convict but factors that help to build an overall case in a legal sense or an overall sense in general terms.
     
  4. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    16
    Jun 24, 2007
    I don't think that Liston had money trouble at that time. He just collected big money for Patterson fights. In the rematch he was paid a record purse of $1.434,000. Even if he had to gave away half of that, he was quite rich. I once read that Liston earned $4,000.000 in his career.

    That's interesting. Was it in Miami or Lewiston? In Miami I saw Liston very far from crying. He looked like a badass escorted by the police. But couldn't see his face clearly under that robe and towels.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,014
    45,996
    Mar 21, 2007
    He didn't. I didn't say he did though, I was referring to Blinky Palerm and The Gray, both were up to their tits in legal difficulties.

    First fight. All of this is related to the first fight.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,843
    12,536
    Jan 4, 2008
    Sure. But Janitor mentioned "compelling evidence", and such I haven't heard of. I think he meant the rematch, but the same goes there (even if it's certainly more suspect).
     
  7. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,906
    8,075
    Jul 17, 2009
    it was no fix,imo. Liston quit in the first fight,and was totally demoralised before the second one even began.
     
  8. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,247
    Feb 6, 2009
    the first fight was on the level but the second is a big NO it wasn't
     
  9. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,478
    10,468
    Jan 6, 2007
    Re: The first fight

    There is no doubt that Clay was blinded by something. The only question is whether or not it was deliberate.

    Can't be definitive there.


    There is no direct evidence that that fight was thrown.

    The most compelling evidence for me was the fight itself. Liston was clearly trying to hurt Clay. He appears to have completely underestimated Clay and not taken him for a serious threat. He was not regarded as much of a threat by serious boxing insiders.

    I believe Liston got discouraged by Clay's elusiveness and speed and decided to 'bow out.'

    In most regards, while I feel the fight was on the level, I think the point is somewhat moot. When a fighter throws a fight, there is the suggestion that, had he not thrown it, he could have won it.

    in this instance, I don't think that is the case.

    If I was fighting Tyson and was paid to take a dive, I very well might.

    But even if I changed my mind on the way to the ring, I don't think that would change things much.


    The second fight is more of a question mark. A complete dog's breakfast of confusion with the ref taking instructions from outside of the ring and the fight being restarted , only to be declared over.


    Again, while it didn't look like much, Ali caught Liston on the temple with a sharp 'pull counter' while Liston was fully extended forward and somewhat off-ballance. Enough to get the knockdown, but scarcely enough to end things, one might think.

    I believe that Liston once again felt that he was in for another humiliating night and stayed down long enough to end the bout.

    When told to continue, he seemed ready, but didn't get too excited when told it was over.

    I believe neither one was thrown in the sense we normally use the word.

    But we can't know for sure.
     
  10. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    If you look at the first fight, Sonny was going after Clay like a terror.
    But, he ran out of gas in the middle of the 5th round.

    Things to look at, Sonny had fought only 4 minutes in the ring in the previous 2 years (Total amount of time in the ring with both Patterson fights).
    His timing was way off, and his footwork was absolutely pathetic.

    Boxers in the know, were convinced Liston just gave up.
    There was no other explanation.
    Unfortunately, many people can't except that.
     
  11. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    42
    Nov 27, 2007
    The second fight was a fix. Watch as Liston thinks about getting up, and then decides to forget about it and roll over. There's no denying the mob influence on his career. Bad thing is George Chuvalo was in line for a title shot earlier if Liston had won.
     
  12. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    76
    Jan 21, 2006
    I dont believe either were fixes, actually, and the tape of what goes down is all I need to show me this.
     
  13. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    MagnaNasakki,
    Do you really think the 'second fight' was on the 'up-n-up' ?
    Even if it was a 'legitimate' knockdown, there is no way in hell that Sonny couldn't have gotten up, or least to one knee, within a minute.
    I believe Sonny just didn't want to go through the Bull**** anymore.
    He really hated the boxing 'business'.
     
  14. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    76
    Jan 21, 2006
    I can give you 10 knockouts off the top of my head where the guy down could get up but doesn't.

    Thats called accepting the count. Its still legitimate loss by knockout.

    Also, he got up, and went back to fighting before Walcott decided to call it a knockout. Could he have got up sooner? Sure, probably. But he didn't. And he still got up in the first place, and had thrown a punch when the fight was waved off.

    Thats not a fix.
     
  15. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,626
    Mar 17, 2010
    In Remnicks book, he also says that a lot of people in the ring could see that Liston was visibly dazed. They said when looking into his eyes they knew he was out of it.