Was Marciano more skillful than...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Maxanthony86, May 6, 2025 at 4:52 AM.


  1. Maxanthony86

    Maxanthony86 New Member Full Member

    35
    31
    Apr 9, 2016
    Carl Froch?

    Just a random thought.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  2. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,790
    43,938
    Mar 3, 2019
  3. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,967
    6,623
    Sep 8, 2013
    Yes. Marciano was also tougher, and a much harder puncher (including pound-for pound).
     
  4. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    9,976
    18,823
    Jul 25, 2015
    I'd say yes. Froch's jab was better though. Both men were underrated feinters.
     
  5. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,859
    7,519
    Jul 18, 2018
  6. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,715
    4,763
    Dec 31, 2018
    More skilled on this inside, Froch was better at range, but Marciano was the far better fighter overall.

    I’d say Marciano had a greater ring IQ, he set Walcott up, not out of luck, but because he read him, Walcott was trigger happy on that slip, right hand counter and Marciano faked a jab the get him to attempt a counter and Marciano had already read it and now it was time to execute it, so he slipped just enough to his left to avoid the right, but timed his own.

    He would also tug on this opponents arms on the inside because he knew that would tire them out and most importantly mean they would struggle to keep their hands up.

    He was very underrated in terms of IQ.
     
  7. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,808
    2,047
    Nov 7, 2017
    I like Froch but Marciano's ability to absolutely murder is all technique. If you think a 185er puts out 925 without perfect kinematic chains you need a few crash courses to get your critical thinking up to snuff.

    It takes mad skills to look that skilless
     
  8. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Bob N Weave Full Member

    16,268
    18,012
    Sep 22, 2021
    God Yes -There isn’t even an inside fighter today at any weight class that could do what he did, he was pretty good.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  9. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Bob N Weave Full Member

    16,268
    18,012
    Sep 22, 2021
    I don’t know about “perfect kinetic chains” I’m not sure what you mean by that but if you mean he got in famously good shape and used his hips properly absolutely throwing at the arms will kill your wind like Foreman, you can turn your hips all day and it gives you access to short punches.
     
  10. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    15,148
    10,792
    Sep 21, 2017
    Doesn't matter. All of Marciano's best opponents were arguably more skilled than him and he beat them. Even if Froch is more skilled, he would get knocked out by Marciano.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,412
    42,537
    Feb 11, 2005
    No.

    In fact I would pick Froch to do a Bute on Rocky. Carl was bigger, more skilled and hit harder. Those are just the facts.
     
  12. Hannibal Barca

    Hannibal Barca Active Member Full Member

    920
    669
    Jul 23, 2010