Was Marciano-Walcott a one punch KO?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Jul 18, 2017.


Was Marciano-Walcott 1 a One Punch KO?

  1. Yes

    85.7%
  2. No

    14.3%
  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    That's your problem.
    You want to make your point so bad about Rocky not being able to deal with SHWs, and you've overdone it to the point that Rocky-Walcott is no longer a one punch KO.
    And that's when you know you that your theories have led you astray. Here is your wake up call.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,124
    Jun 2, 2006
    Its another,the re-enactment version.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,124
    Jun 2, 2006
    Its another,the re-enactment version.
     
  4. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Correct but if you're going to grade them then Marciano would trump Hearns there.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,124
    Jun 2, 2006
    IYO.
     
  6. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Well of course Marciano was going to win, he beat him the first time and the victor usually wins the rematch even quicker.
     
  7. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012

    In most people's opinion I can bet.
     
  8. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    30,091
    36,913
    Jul 24, 2004
    Everybody calm down. Here's a YouTube video of Jersey Joe on Rocky's TV show.
    Joe says more than once that "if it hadn't been for the 13th round I'd still would have been champ". No mention of any other punch, any other round. Walcott CONCLUSIVELY states it was the 13th round (which was the KO round) that lost him the fight.

    Rocky points to a photo of the punch and Joe say "we wasn't acting THAT night".

    END OF STORY. No re-enactments needed.

    This content is protected
     
    reznick and Wass1985 like this.
  9. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Can't believe this was even debated.

    Goes to show that on this forum, merely acknowledging Rocks accomplishments is an uphill battle.
     
    Wass1985 likes this.
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,535
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    Grade them on what?

    Ferocity? Speed? Timing? Aesthetically pleasing? Technique?

    I mean has anyone ever beaten a man as great as Duran with a straight right hand before?
     
    mcvey likes this.
  11. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    As in the fighter being worn down or hurt prior to the finishing shot, have you actually seen the fight? Go and watch the end of the first round and tell me what happened.
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,535
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    So we're rating on who was more worn down?

    Then yes Rocky wins the debate as he wore Walcott down over 13 rounds whereas Hearns didn't wear Duran down, he caught him cold.
     
  13. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Hearns was destroying Duran before the final punch.

    Walcott was dancing and shifting around.
     
    Wass1985 likes this.
  14. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Not true, Duran was in a much worse state after one round than Walcott was prior to his knockout defeat.
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,535
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    I thought we were rating on who was more worn down?

    I'm not sure what scale you're using but there's no way Duran was more worn down than Walcott.
     
    mcvey likes this.