Was Muhammad Ali's 60s era really that strong?

I wouldn't even go there he thrives on being wrong so i would give up if you think it bothers him,it doesn't! TRUST me!

Its like he grows into a bigger idiot as time goes by the more you show him the more oblivious he gets. Biggest twat? I wouldn't go that far to call Dago that there's to much competition on here for that but hes definatley a top 3 which is why i like responding to his ridiculous posts,they are quite entertaining.

 

I want you to list very specifically my reason for saying "Vitali only lost to Chris Byrd when he held a title and he wasn't seen as "the champ"."

Just to make sure we are on the same page.

 

That's why you ran like a *****.

 

Ali was bigger than boxing. He was loved world wide because of what he stood for. a illegal war against a third world country and a super power, jim crow and oppressive segregation, a right to practice his religion, and a voice that spoke out for black people. Boxing was only a platform and he was truly the peoples champion in and out of the ring. of course young people wont understand this. you just had to be there in the wild and crazy 1960s.

 

I ran because i envisioned running into your 135 pound frame on the street and i panicked!

 

I'm big af if my frame alone is 135 lbs.

 

You are right. I have shown Mr.DagoWop where his mistakes are and how stupid he is several times and I can now only assume he likes being beaten up and passed around

 

No we are not on the same page! I finished the book and returned it, whilst you are still trying to get the first paragraph under way.
Funny how you ask me questions and I can answer but you have never once been able to answer any of my questions when asked about your comments. That tells a story in itself

For the last time. You answered Andrew1 when he said you hadnt noted much about the Klitschko brothers on your post about bigger and smaller HWs fighting. You said why he wasnt noted but pointed out he had lost to Byrd.
As for "the champ" part, I never commented on that at any time. You keep going on about that and I hadnt agreed or disagreed with that or disagreed with you initially but pointed out when you said that Vitali had lost to Byrd that it was an injury loss in a fight Vitali was ahead in and that it wasnt like Vitali was dominated or knocked out.

Now thats the last time I can be bothered to explain it to you. I pity anyone that sits next to you when a good film is on

 

So your only beef is that I didn't site the Vitali loss as an injury loss?

 

I didnt have a beef. I just pointed out in that particular comparison of results between bigger and smaller HWs fighting that that particular loss wasnt clear cut like many of the other fights

 

And that is exactly what I am saying I wasn't comparing. I wasn't saying that the Vitali-Byrd fight is an example of a smaller guy beating a bigger guy like the others. I fully acknowledge that Vitali was winning the fight before the stoppage.

 

no. for being it.

 

no, for being it.